Failed Engine Type On BA 777 Was Subject To 2011 AD | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Wed, Sep 16, 2015

Failed Engine Type On BA 777 Was Subject To 2011 AD

GE Says Specific Engine That Failed Used Different Parts

The FAA issued an Airworthiness Directive for the type of engine on a British Airways 777 that suffered an uncontained failure on takeoff from McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas last week, though GE, the engine's manufacturer, disputes that the particular engine was covered by the AD.

AD 2011-15-06 for  General Electric Company GE90-76B; GE90-77B; GE90-85B; GE90-90B; and GE90-94B Turbofan Engines  required initial and repetitive fluorescent penetrant inspections (FPIs) and eddy current inspections (ECIs) of the high-pressure compressor rotor (HPCR) 8-10 stage spool, part numbers (P/Ns) 1844M90G01 and 1844M90G02, for cracks between the 9-10 stages at each piece-part exposure.

This AD was prompted by cracks discovered on one HPCR 8-10 spool between the 9-10 stages in the weld joint.

The FAA said it was issuing this AD "to prevent failure of the HPCR 8-10 stage spool, uncontained engine failure, and damage to the airplane."

The AD became effective August 18, 2011.

Initial examination of the left engine by the NTSB revealed multiple breaches of the engine case in the area around the high pressure compressor. Examination of the material recovered from runway found several pieces of the high pressure compressor spool (approximately 7-8 inches in length).

Initial examination of the airplane by NTSB revealed that the left engine and pylon, left fuselage structure and inboard left wing airplane were substantially damaged by the fire.

In a statement posted on Twitter, GE said that the GE90-85B "had two different configurations to the compressor spool. The original compressor spool is involved in the BA event; the later compressor spool configuration is referenced in the FAA AD.

"That 2011 AD does not relate at all to the compressor spool in question in the BA event. The FAA AD refers to inspecting a weld that doesn't exist in the original spool configuration, The AD was essentially a modification to the operating manual. It's simply an issue of two different configurations."

(Image from file)

FMI: AD

Advertisement

More News

Airborne-Flight Training 05.09.24: ERAU at AIAA, LIFT Diamond Buy, Epic A&P

Also: Vertical Flight Society, NBAA Maintenance Conference, GA Honored, AMT Scholarship For the first time, students from Embry-Riddle’s Daytona Beach, Florida, campus took t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.07.24): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cessna 150

(FAA) Inspector Observed That Both Fuel Tanks Were Intact And That Only A Minimal Amount Of Fuel Remained In Each Analysis: According to the pilot, approximately 8 miles from the d>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.08.24)

“Pyka’s Pelican Cargo is unlike any other UAS solution on the market for contested logistics. We assessed a number of leading capabilities and concluded that the Pelica>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC