Documentary Shows 'Underwear Bomber' Would Not Have Brought Down Plane | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Sat, Mar 13, 2010

Documentary Shows 'Underwear Bomber' Would Not Have Brought Down Plane

Tests Show A330 Fuselage Would Not Have Been Breached

While admitting there are some discrepancies, a documentary produced by the BBC, which aired this week on The Discovery Channel, maintains that the bomb allegedly carried by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would not have been strong enough to bring down the Northwest A330 as it descended into Detroit on December 25th.

In the program "How Safe Are Our Skies," the producers used a PETN device they say was identical to the one allegedly carried by Abdulmutallab, and detonated it inside the fuselage of a decommissioned 747 in a position identical to the one occupied by the alleged bomber. Video of the event shows the outer skin of the aircraft bulging and rippling from the force of the explosion, but it does not open a hole in the side of the airplane. Captain J. Joseph, identified in the documentary as an aviation expert, said the explosion popped a few rivets out of the skin, but there would not have been any explosive decompression of the airplane. "The actual aircraft would have remained intact," he told Discovery News.

The documentary concludes that, had the bombing been successful, the bomber and the person sitting next to him would have been killed, but most passengers and crew would have survived the explosion. Many would have suffered ruptured eardrums from the shock wave created by the blast.

While a decommissioned 747 is not exactly a newer A330, the documentary producers say that works in the test's favor. The composite materials used in the A330 fuselage are stronger than the older aircraft's aluminum skin, and would have withstood the blast better. They also say that, because the attempt came at about 10,000 feet as the airplane was descending to land, the differences in air pressure between the inside of the aircraft and ambient pressure would not have been great enough to be a significant factor.

FMI: www.bbc.co.uk, www.discovery.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.24): Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System

Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System ODALS consists of seven omnidirectional flashing lights located in the approach area of a nonprecision runway. Five lights are located on t>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.05.24)

"Polaris Dawn, the first of the program’s three human spaceflight missions, is targeted to launch to orbit no earlier than summer 2024. During the five-day mission, the crew >[...]

Airborne 05.06.24: Gone West-Dick Rutan, ICON BK Update, SpaceX EVA Suit

Also: 1800th E-Jet, Uncle Sam Sues For Landing Gear, Embraer Ag Plane, Textron Parts A friend of the family reported that Lt. Col. (Ret.) Richard Glenn Rutan flew west on Friday, M>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.06xx.24)

“Our aircrews are trained and capable of rapidly shifting from operational missions to humanitarian roles. We planned to demonstrate how we, and our BORSTAR partners, respond>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC