FAA Rebukes Group's Claims Against Funding Plan, Part Two | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 02, 2007

FAA Rebukes Group's Claims Against Funding Plan, Part Two

Stresses Fees Would NOT Be Imposed For Flying Through Terminal Airspace

In a telephone conversation with Aero-News last week, representatives with the Federal Aviation Administration rebuked many of the points presented by the Alliance for Aviation Across America, in that group's rebuttal to the FAA's policy document released April 23 on the subject of user fees. Over the next several days, ANN will present those arguments, and the FAA's contrasting position on each issue.

  • Read Part One Here

As Aero-News reported, the Alliance says the FAA's bill clearly designates user fee taxes may be administered on any aircraft flying through Class B or any other type of terminal airspace, including small planes. But FAA Economist Weingart emphatically states the FAA has no plans to do so.

"We don't propose to include fees for GA to fly through Class B," Weingart tells ANN, "or any other type of airspace. The intent in everything we've been saying about the proposal is the fees would only apply to GA if they actually land or depart at a large hub airport.

"As we said in the Fact Sheet... we recognize based on the feedback from the stakeholder community some of the legislative language on that isn't as clear as we intended. We are certainly agreeable on suggestions on how to clarify that language."

"And you would not be charged any fees for weather services, or flight following, or any of that," added Melanie Alvord, Assistant Administrator for Communications. "Because that is safety related, we included it in the General Fund contributions to funding."

The FAA also takes issue with the Alliance's claim that the FAA's proposal calls for $1.36 billion to be appropriated for services to collect user fees in the first 60 days.

"That has nothing to do with administrative costs of billing and collecting those fees," Weingart said. "What we realized in developing the proposal that we'd have a one-time transition issue, because today the excise taxes -- which are primarily ticket taxes on airline tickets -- get paid to the government before the airplane flies (as tickets are often purchased beforehand -- Ed.)

"Under a user fee system, typically we would bill after the service is provided," he continues, "and like most bills, you would have 20 days or 30 days to pay. So the revenues from user fees would actually be flowing in probably one month to two months after the service is provided -- so we have a one-time gap in revenue that needs to be filled, and that's what that $1.36 billion is intended to do.

"In fact, there is actually a provision in the bill that requires us to pay back that $1.36 billion in the first year of the new system."

Coming Wednesday -- The FAA Says Congress Will NOT Lose Oversight Privileges
FMI: www.faa.gov, www.aviationacrossamerica.org/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC