Lawsuits Settled In 2010 Accident In Palo Alto | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Tue, Oct 23, 2012

Lawsuits Settled In 2010 Accident In Palo Alto

Two Employees Of Tesla Motors Fatally Injured When Cessna 310 Went Down

Three lawsuits filed as a result of a February 17, 2010 accident in Palo Alto, CA, have been settled, court documents reveal. The accident resulted in the fatal injury of two employees of Tesla Motors. Terms of the settlements have not been released.

The accident occurred when pilot Douglas Bourn departed Palo Alto Airport in a heavy fog at 0755 PST despite being told by ATC he was not cleared for takeoff due to the restricted visibility. He was told by the controller that he was departing at his own risk. A few minutes after takeoff, the plane, a Cessna 310R, struck powerlines near an East Palo Alto neighborhood and went down among the houses about a half mile from the airport. There was a post-impact fire. Bourn, as well as passengers Brian Finn and Andrew Ingram who were employed by Tesla Motors, were fatally injured in the accident. No one on the ground was hurt, though there was some property damage due to the fire. The NTSB found that pilot error was the probable cause of the accident, though the board's reports are not admissible as evidence in court.

The Palo Alto News Online reports that Ingram's and Finn's families had filed the lawsuits against Air Unique, the company owned by Bourn, and the pilot's estate. They said that Bourn willingly undertook the flight in unsafe conditions. Lawyers for Bourn's estate tried in July to have the suits dismissed, saying that Tesla's worker's compensation plan covered their deaths. but that was not allowed by the court.

The trial had been set for November. The families have filed a request for case dismissals, which will be considered by the judge in January, 2013.

(Cessna 310 image from file. Not accident airplane)

FMI: Probable Cause Report

Advertisement

More News

Bolen Gives Congress a Rare Thumbs-Up

Aviation Governance Secured...At Least For a While The National Business Aviation Association similarly applauded the passage of the FAA's recent reauthorization, contentedly recou>[...]

The SportPlane Resource Guide RETURNS!!!!

Emphasis On Growing The Future of Aviation Through Concentration on 'AFFORDABLE FLYERS' It's been a number of years since the Latest Edition of Jim Campbell's HUGE SportPlane Resou>[...]

Buying Sprees Continue: Textron eAviation Takes On Amazilia Aerospace

Amazilia Aerospace GmbH, Develops Digital Flight Control, Flight Guidance And Vehicle Management Systems Textron eAviation has acquired substantially all the assets of Amazilia Aer>[...]

Hawker 4000 Bizjets Gain Nav System, Data Link STC

Honeywell's Primus Brings New Tools and Niceties for Hawker Operators Hawker 4000 business jet operators have a new installation on the table, now that the FAA has granted an STC f>[...]

Echodyne Gets BVLOS Waiver for AiRanger Aircraft

Company Celebrates Niche-but-Important Advancement in Industry Standards Echodyne has announced full integration of its proprietary 'EchoFlight' radar into the e American Aerospace>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC