Huerta Tells NTSB Cockpit Electronics Can't Be Made Tamper Proof | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Fri, Jun 12, 2015

Huerta Tells NTSB Cockpit Electronics Can't Be Made Tamper Proof

Comments In A Letter To The Board Concerning Recommendations On 'Black Box' Redesign

FAA Administrator Michael Huerta says that there is no legal reason or technological way for cockpit electronics to be made "tamper proof" in response to a recommendation made by the NTSB.

Bloomberg News reports the Huerta (pictured) sent a letter to the NTSB in response to a recommendation to redesign the cockpit voice and flight data recorders in the cockpits of airplanes. “There appears to be no safe way to ensure recorders cannot be intentionally disabled while keeping the airplane safe from electrical failure that could become hazardous,” Huerta wrote in the April 22 letter obtained by Bloomberg.

Huerta also said that there is "no compelling reason" to require airlines to add video recorders to the cockpits of airliners. He said such information would not help investigators in understanding the reason for accidents or intentional crashes such as the Germanwings crash.

In the letter, Huerta cited regulations that require airplanes to be designed in such a way that pilots can shut off electricity to systems in order to diagnose overheating and potential fires in flight. Such a scenario caused a Swissair flight to go down in 1998. The pilots detected smoke in the cockpit but could not cut the power to the in-flight entertainment system to diagnose the problem and contain the ensuing fire. The plane went down near Nova Scotia, resulting in the fatal injury of all 229 people on board. 

“The FAA does not want to introduce design requirements that could expose the airplane to system risks that can lead to cascading failure and fires,” Huerta said in the letter.

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.24): Airport Marking Aids

Airport Marking Aids Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in ac>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.28.24)

"It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, for manned aircraft to see a drone while conducting crop-enhancing and other aerial applications at low altitudes and high speeds. We>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.24)

Aero Linx: The Skyhawk Association The Skyhawk Association is a non-profit organization founded by former Skyhawk Pilots which is open to anyone with an affinity for the A-4 Skyhaw>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.29.24)

“The T-54A benefits from an active Beechcraft King Air assembly line in Wichita, Kansas, where all required METS avionics and interior modifications are installed on the line>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.29.24)

Aero Linx: Aerostar Owners Association The Association offers the Aerostar Owner a unique opportunity to tap an invaluable source of information concerning the care and feeding of >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC