Huerta Tells NTSB Cockpit Electronics Can't Be Made Tamper Proof | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Fri, Jun 12, 2015

Huerta Tells NTSB Cockpit Electronics Can't Be Made Tamper Proof

Comments In A Letter To The Board Concerning Recommendations On 'Black Box' Redesign

FAA Administrator Michael Huerta says that there is no legal reason or technological way for cockpit electronics to be made "tamper proof" in response to a recommendation made by the NTSB.

Bloomberg News reports the Huerta (pictured) sent a letter to the NTSB in response to a recommendation to redesign the cockpit voice and flight data recorders in the cockpits of airplanes. “There appears to be no safe way to ensure recorders cannot be intentionally disabled while keeping the airplane safe from electrical failure that could become hazardous,” Huerta wrote in the April 22 letter obtained by Bloomberg.

Huerta also said that there is "no compelling reason" to require airlines to add video recorders to the cockpits of airliners. He said such information would not help investigators in understanding the reason for accidents or intentional crashes such as the Germanwings crash.

In the letter, Huerta cited regulations that require airplanes to be designed in such a way that pilots can shut off electricity to systems in order to diagnose overheating and potential fires in flight. Such a scenario caused a Swissair flight to go down in 1998. The pilots detected smoke in the cockpit but could not cut the power to the in-flight entertainment system to diagnose the problem and contain the ensuing fire. The plane went down near Nova Scotia, resulting in the fatal injury of all 229 people on board. 

“The FAA does not want to introduce design requirements that could expose the airplane to system risks that can lead to cascading failure and fires,” Huerta said in the letter.

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.24)

"Fly-by-wire flight, coupled with additional capability that are being integrated into ALFA, provide a great foundation for Bell to expand on its autonomous capabilities. This airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.24)

Aero Linx: B-21 Raider The B-21 Raider will be a dual-capable penetrating strike stealth bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. The B-21 will form th>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC