Near-Miss For UK Charter Airline | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Sat, Dec 09, 2006

Near-Miss For UK Charter Airline

Aircraft Passes 56 Feet From Vehicle On Runway

A 737 operated by the UK's Excel Airways missed a vehicle on the runway it was using by only 56 feet according to an official report released Friday from the country's Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB).

The flight was departing Manchester bound for the Greek island of Kos with 190 passengers aboard in July 2003. The pilots were unaware the runway they were using was operating at a reduced length to allow for a team removing rubber deposits at the departure end.

The reports says the pilots couldn't see the opposite end of the runway because of a slight rise in the middle. It wasn't until the aircraft cleared the rise that the pilot saw the vehicles at the far end. By that time it was too late to abort the takeoff. The pilots believed they cleared the vehicles with a good margin.

The report found the crew were unaware of the reduced runway length available and irregularities with the way the airport and ATC handled disseminating information.

In fact, a day earlier, ATC directed three separate airliners to go around after clearing them to land on the same runway. When asked, none of the three crews were aware of the rubber-removal operation, or the reduced runway available. After telling the tower they couldn't accept a landing under the conditions, they were told to go around and assigned another runway.

AAIB says while the aircrew was clearly at fault, procedures for planning and managing future runway maintenance activities were altered to address concerns the agency expressed to both the operators of Manchester Airport and the National Air Traffic Service.

The primary cause of the near-disaster according to the AAIB was the flight crew did not realize the runway was operating at reduced length despite being in possession of a NOTAM concerning the work-in-progress, an ATIS broadcast relating to the work-in-progress and ATC passing information on the takeoff distance available.

FMI: www.aaib.dft.gov.uk

Advertisement

More News

Airborne-Flight Training 05.09.24: ERAU at AIAA, LIFT Diamond Buy, Epic A&P

Also: Vertical Flight Society, NBAA Maintenance Conference, GA Honored, AMT Scholarship For the first time, students from Embry-Riddle’s Daytona Beach, Florida, campus took t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.07.24): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cessna 150

(FAA) Inspector Observed That Both Fuel Tanks Were Intact And That Only A Minimal Amount Of Fuel Remained In Each Analysis: According to the pilot, approximately 8 miles from the d>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.08.24)

“Pyka’s Pelican Cargo is unlike any other UAS solution on the market for contested logistics. We assessed a number of leading capabilities and concluded that the Pelica>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC