Pentagon Report Says F-35 Is 2 Years Behind Schedule | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Fri, Jul 24, 2009

Pentagon Report Says F-35 Is 2 Years Behind Schedule

Joint Estimate Team Predicts JSF Reach Full Production Before 2016

A joint service panel formed to make an independent assessment of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter development process says the program has fallen 2 years behind, even while the fate of the F-22 Raptor is being hotly debated on Capitol Hill.

Some Senator and their aides who favor building more F-22's say the Pentagon committee's report should have been released during the F-22 debate. They say the Pentagon should be more forthcoming about problems with the F-35. Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morell says the first production aircraft should be completed on time, but that it's still unclear if full production can ramp up on schedule. He said the report was not suppressed by the Pentagon. He said the JET report has been "dredged up" by supporters of funding for additional F-22 Raptors.

Congressional Quarterly is reporting that the Joint Estimate Team (JET) has determined that the F-35 won't be in full production until 2016. Original estimates had been that it would be ready 2 years earlier. The Government Accounting Office says the delay will cost taxpayers an additional $7.4 billion. The Pentagon would like to try to accelerate the program, but GAO cautions that could up the price tag another $33.4 billion.

Experts told CQ that the efforts to kill funding for 5 more Raptors, which was stripped from the Senate Defense Bill this week, would have been hurt by the JET report.

CQ reports that the delay could affect the air fleets of all the services because it is intended to replace the F-15, F-16, and F/A-18. News of the delay will likely have some bearing on the debate over funding for the F-22, which is still in the Defense appropriations bill under consideration in the House.

FMI: www.dod.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC