Boeing Fuel Tank Issues Affect KC-46 Delivery Schedule | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Sat, Mar 11, 2023

Boeing Fuel Tank Issues Affect KC-46 Delivery Schedule

Affected Fuel Tanks Could Require Downtime for 12+ Aircraft

Boeing’s KC-46 program will likely experience more delays, just like the 767 series aircraft currently awaiting fuel tank parts.

Reportedly, a quality issue surrounding a delivery of center fuel tanks made by subcontractor Triumph Group’s aerospace structures arm. The tanks, as delivered to Boeing, were incorrectly cleaned before painting, leaving their paint application somewhat inadequate. Boeing acknowledged the existence of a ‘quality issue’ without directly affirming the Triumph issue, admitting that some 767F and KC-46 aircraft had to be worked on before delivery.

The process, if it is indeed the center fuel tank as rumored, would entail stripping and repainting the inside of affected fuel tanks, with estimates running around a dozen affected aircraft sitting in Boeing inventory. The issue may reach back further, too, with some aircraft possibly affected as far back as 2021. Triumph sold its aero structures arm to Daher Aerospace last year.

Reports cite the increasing frequency of delivery issues at Boeing, including issues with software, parts, and fabrication ahead of delivery. A data error surrounding the forward pressure bulkhead of the 787 Dreamliner has stalled deliveries of the type for a time, another rumor pointing to similar delays for 37 MAX aircraft that could stretch as long as a year, thanks to issues with the Option selection Software used for pre-delivery configuration. Boeing contends that the reports are incorrect, with the company line saying the issue was little more than a documentation change, not a software problem.

FMI: www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC