FAA Proposes $211,000 Civil Penalty Against Dukes Aerospace | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Sep 02, 2015

FAA Proposes $211,000 Civil Penalty Against Dukes Aerospace

Alleges Violations Of Drug And Alcohol Testing Regulations

The FAA has proposed a $211,000 civil penalty against Dukes Aerospace Inc., of Northridge, CA, for allegedly violating federal drug and alcohol testing regulations.

The FAA alleges that Dukes failed to include four of its safety sensitive employees in random drug and alcohol testing pools. Three of the four employees performed safety sensitive functions while not in the random pool.

Additionally, the agency alleges that the company did not receive verified negative results before transferring nine employees into safety sensitive positions; ask 10 safety-sensitive employees whether they had tested positive or had refused to submit to a DOT pre-employment drug or alcohol test at other companies they had applied to for safety-sensitive transportation work during the previous two years.

Other allegations include the failure to use a scientifically valid method of random selection for a drug test, and conduct a random drug test on two employees rather than the alcohol test for which they had been selected, and ensure that an employee underwent a directly observed urine specimen collection immediately after having been informed that the employee’s earlier specimen was invalid and the employee had no adequate medical explanation for the result. The company allegedly directed a new collection, but did not specify it had to be directly observed.

Finally, the FAA says Dukes did not include all required elements in the company’s drug and alcohol testing policy, specifically, the consequences for a verified positive drug test or a refusal to test, and the consequences of using drugs while performing a safety sensitive function.
 
Dukes has requested to meet with the FAA to discuss the case.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC