U.S. Disappointed In EU ETS Court Decision | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.22.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.23.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.18.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.19.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Dec 24, 2011

U.S. Disappointed In EU ETS Court Decision

Officials Say They Have 'Strong Legal Objections'

A State Department official says that the U.S. Government is strongly opposed to the imposition of a European emissions cap-and-trade scheme on U.S. flagged airliners. The EU's highest court affirmed the Union's right to impose the fees in a decision handed down Wednesday.

"We continue to have strong legal and policy objections to the inclusion of flights by non-EU air carriers in the EU ETS," said Krishna R. Urs, deputy assistant secretary for transportation affairs at the U.S. State Department. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had warned of possible reprisals before the ruling was made public.

Reuters reports that China's state-run news agency Xinhua warned of a possible trade war if the tax is imposed, though that country's foreign ministry did not take that hard-line stance. Various non-European airline associations have also vehemently opposed the measure, and have released statements reiterating the opposition in the days following the ruling.

European officials say that the threats of trade wars or sanctions are "rhetoric," but some non-European analysts say that some kind of retaliation, even if it is minor, is to be expected to show that the U.S. disapproves of the tax. U.S.-flagged carriers have said they will grudgingly pay the tax if it comes to that, though they are considering their legal options. Legislation is still pending in Congress that would make it illegal for U.S. airlines to comply with the law, which could place the companies in a no-win situation.

The EU has vowed to "hold firm" on the fee, and points out that if U.S. and other airlines are taking "equivalent measures" then no tax will be imposed.

FMI: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_en.htm

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: In Praise of Alabama’s Patriot Aircraft USA

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): "Ain’t Your Daddy’s Super Cub”—Don Wade Co-owned by Don and Ron Wade—the former of Don’s Dream Machines, a storied >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR22

Pilot-Rated Passenger Reported That The Pilot Did Not Adequately “Round Out” The Landing Flare And The Airplane Bounced And Yawed To The Right Analysis: The pilot state>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.21.25): Dead Reckoning

Dead Reckoning Dead reckoning, as applied to flying, is the navigation of an airplane solely by means of computations based on airspeed, course, heading, wind direction, and speed,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.21.25)

Aero Linx: Lake Amphibian Club This website is created and sponsored by the Lake Amphibian Club, to help spread the word about these wonderful, versatile amphibians that can land j>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.21.25)

“I am deeply honored to be sworn in as NASA administrator. NASA’s mission is as imperative and urgent as ever — to push the boundaries of human exploration, ignit>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC