ATA: Proposed Flightcrew Duty Time Rule Is Poorly Conceived | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Nov 17, 2010

ATA: Proposed Flightcrew Duty Time Rule Is Poorly Conceived

Airlines Call for Significant Revisions To Existing Proposal

The Air Transport Association of America (ATA) submitted its public comments Monday to the FAA in response to the agency's Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest Requirements NPRM, calling for significant revisions to the existing proposal.

"The airlines continue to strongly support regulations that demonstrably improve safety performance. That is why ATA in its role on the Aviation Rulemaking Committee was a strong supporter of a science-based approach to create a new Flightcrew Duty Time Rule," said ATA President and CEO James C. May. "We are very concerned that significant aspects of the proposed rule are not science-based."

According to May, beyond the core measures, which we support, the rule, if implemented as written, "would create onerous and duplicative regulations, which in major respects do not mitigate fatigue or increase safety. This significant operational and scheduling complexity will adversely affect our crews and customers.


James May

"We are very concerned that the proposed rule reflects a lack of understanding by FAA of how airlines operate," said May. "Our concerns are validated by the fact that FAA's economic analysis is off the mark by at least a factor of 15 in its impact assessment, making it imperative that this proposal be significantly revised."

May called on FAA to work with the airlines and other interested parties to "fashion a rule based on scientific research and operational factors."

FMI: www.airlines.org

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Capella Aircraft Corp FW1C50

Pilot Reported That He Was Unfamiliar With The Single Seat Amateur-Built Airplane And His Intent Was To Perform High-Speed Taxi Testing Analysis: The pilot reported that he was unf>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Timber Tiger Touts Curtiss Jenny Replicas

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): First Kits to Ship October 2023 Having formerly resurrected the storied shape of the Ryan ST—in effigy, anyway—Montrose, Colorado-based Tim>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.04.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC