FAA Publishes Final Rule Amending Commuter Ops | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.28.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.29.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.30.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Mon, Oct 01, 2007

FAA Publishes Final Rule Amending Commuter Ops

Rule Became Effective September 27, 2007.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is making a minor technical change to a final rule, Commuter Operations and General Certification and Operations Requirements. This final rule established the requirements for certain management officials for certificate holders. In the final rule the FAA unintentionally included an incorrect experience requirement for the Director of Maintenance for commuter and ondemand operators. This amendment corrects that experience requirement.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

On December 20, 1995 (60 FR 65832), the FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register, better known as ‘‘the commuter rule’’, that established the requirements for certain management officials in parts 121 and 135. Although the FAA clearly stated in the preamble to this final rule that ‘‘In addition to other requirements, these candidates will have to have three years of experience (within their respective fields) within the past six years to be eligible for a Director position,’’ the specific years of experience in the rule language in part 135 was incorrect. The part 121 experience requirement of § 119.67 correctly states this ‘‘3 years within 6 years’’ experience requirement; however the part 135 requirement in § 119.71 was incorrectly stated as ‘‘3 years within 3 years.’’ By petition for rulemaking dated September 5, 2007, the Regional Air Cargo Carriers Association (RACCA) asked the FAA to correct this technical error. The RACCA correctly pointed out that it makes no sense to have an experience requirement in part 135 that is more stringent than the same requirement in part 121.

FMI: www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocumentDetail&d=FAA-2007-0875-0001

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Cozy Cub

Witness Reported The Airplane Was Flying Low And Was In A Left Bank When It Struck The Power Line Analysis: The pilot was on final approach to land when the airplane collided with >[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Seated On The Edge Of Forever -- A PPC's Bird's Eye View

From 2012 (YouTube Edition): A Segment Of The Sport Aviation World That Truly Lives "Low And Slow" Pity the life of ANN's Chief videographer, Nathan Cremisino... shoot the most exc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.29.25)

Aero Linx: International Business Aviation Council (IBAC) IBAC promotes the growth of business aviation, benefiting all sectors of its industry and in all regions of the world. As >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.29.25): Execute Missed Approach

Execute Missed Approach Instructions issued to a pilot making an instrument approach which means continue inbound to the missed approach point and execute the missed approach proce>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC