Who Knows What's Going on With Starliner? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Aug 09, 2024

Who Knows What's Going on With Starliner?

A "Three Hour Tour" Stretches Into Months for Gilligan & Co - Or, Wilmore & Williams

After about two months of delays, space enthusiasts have begun wondering just how functional the Boeing Starliner is, after apparently stranding Astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams on the ISS.

Initially, the problematic Starliner was slated for a quick 'out-n-back' mission that would serve as its official entry into crewed launches, taking Wilmore and Williams to the ISS and back. On its outbound leg, Starliner suffered a number of thruster malfunctions, which Boeing had downplayed as an issue ahead of the return flight. At first, the company said it had merely postponed the launch in order to study elements of the system that would later be lost during the reentry process, but now, they aren't so sure, having been unable to replicate and identify the root cause of the thruster failure.

As space aficionados ticked the days off their calendars, the story seemed less and less a case of simple mechanical or software error and more one of corporate obfuscation. Grumbling abounds on forums and social media, as the original "three hour tour" planned for Starliner stretches indefinitely into the future. Boeing hasn't had a great track record of quality-first, detail-oriented, attentive manufacturing in its civil aviation side as of late, and its continued foibles against the newcomer SpaceX has really depleted its brand cachet. That leaves the peanut gallery to believe it's not all that unlikely that the firm is trying to keep quiet about the depth of Starliner's issues, particularly if any problems could be easily solved with a quick and dirty software update.

Some well-placed journalists have said that NASA, famously conservative about safety when it comes to crewed flights, have put off the detachment of Starliner from the ISS. Reportedly, the thruster issues could, in the right sequence of failure, result in a collision with the ISS soon after undocking, or leave the capsule to uncontrollably flail during its atmospheric reentry. An entire headache of software has come to light, thanks to Eric Berger's digging, which revealed, in typical Boeing fashion, an uncharacteristic level of engineering apathy:

"Three separate, well-placed sources have confirmed to Ars Technica that the current flight software on board Starliner cannot perform an automated undocking from the space station and entry into Earth’s atmosphere," said Berger. "At first blush, this seems absurd. After all, Boeing’s Orbital Flight Test 2 mission in May 2022 was a fully automated test of the Starliner vehicle. During this mission, the spacecraft flew up to the space station without crew on board and then returned to Earth six days later. Although the 2022 flight test was completed by a different Starliner vehicle, it clearly demonstrated the ability of the program's flight software to autonomously dock and return to Earth. Boeing did not respond to a media query about why this capability was removed for the crew flight test."

By now, it's looking more and more likely that Wilmore and Williams will have to come back home aboard ol' reliable, the SpaceX Crew Dragon.

FMI: www.nasa.gov

 


Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.04.25): Cooperative Surveillance

Cooperative Surveillance Any surveillance system, such as secondary surveillance radar (SSR), wide-area multilateration (WAM), or ADS-B, that is dependent upon the presence of cert>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.04.25)

Aero Linx: OX5 Aviation Pioneers Incorporated in 1955 as a Pa 501 (c)(3) Not for Profit Corporation, the OX5 Aviation Pioneers is dedicated to bringing before the public the accomp>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Extra Flugzeugproduktions EA 300/SC

The Pilot Appeared To Regain Control After Six Rotations And Attempted To “Fly Out” Inverted But Had Insufficient Altitude On November 8, 2025, at 1038 eastern standard>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Bally Bomber - The All Time Ultimate Warbird Replica?

From 2018 (YouTube Edition): Aero-News Talks With The Airplane's Builder One of the many unique airplanes at AirVenture 2018 was a 1/3-scale B-17 bomber built by Jack Bally, who ta>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.05.25)

Aero Linx: Society of U.S. Army Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFS) The Society of US Army Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFS) serves to advance the science and art of Aerospace Medicine and its allie>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC