NTSB Revisits 'Child In Lap' Debate | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Sep 08, 2010

NTSB Revisits 'Child In Lap' Debate

2009 Accident In Montana Fatally Injured 7 Children

The NTSB is once again asking the FAA to require all passengers, even those under 2 years of age, to have their own seats and seat belts. The recommendation follows a 2009 accident in which 14 people, including seven children, were fatally injured when the Pilatus PC-12 in which they were traveling went down in Montana.

The aircraft was taking members of three families to a ski vacation in Bozeman, MT, but diverted to Butte for unknown reasons. It went down in a cemetery adjacent to the city's airport. The NTSB said several of the children were found "far" from the wreckage of the aircraft, suggesting they were not properly restrained in individual seats.

Nora Marshall is chief of NTSB survival factors in aviation safety. She told The Associated Press "We strongly believe one seat, one person." The board has been making similar recommendations to the FAA for two decades, and an FAA spokeswoman said the agency will take the most recent recommendation under advisement, but has no rules changes in the works at this time.

The NTSB admits that the severity of the crash made it unlikely that anyone would have survived regardless of seat belts. But its most recent recommendation says the accident renews the boards longstanding concerns about restraints.

Under current rules, an adult may hold a child under 2 years of age on his or her lap during takeoff, landing, or turbulence. The FAA agrees that putting the child in an individual seat with its own seat belts would be safer, but says it does not want to require families to pay for the additional seat or push them onto the highways for their travel, which FAA spokeswoman Alison Duquestte says is less safe.

The NTSB disagrees with that assessment. A study put together by the Board indicates there is no "clearly defined relationship between diversion from air travel and highway accidents or injury."

FMI: www.ntsb.gov, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Douglas A-4K

Pilot Applied Full Aft Stick And Nose-Up Trim, But The Airplane Remained On The Runway Analysis: The pilot reported that a preflight inspection and flight control checks revealed n>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: PBY Catalina--From Wartime to Double Sunrise to the Long Sunset

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Before They’re All Gone... Humankind has been messing about in airplanes for almost 120-years. In that time, thousands of aircraft representing i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.01.25): Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) A transportation system that transports people and property by air between two points in the NAS using aircraft with advanced technologies, including el>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.01.25)

Aero Linx: MQ-1B Predator The MQ-1B Predator is an armed, multi-mission, medium-altitude, long-endurance remotely piloted aircraft that is employed primarily as an intelligence-col>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC