EASA Issues Rotax Safety Bulletin | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Thu, Jan 08, 2015

EASA Issues Rotax Safety Bulletin

Notes 'Possible Service Difficulties' Including In-Flight Engine Failures

EASA has issued a safety bulletin for Rotax 912 and 914 engines installed on a variety of aircraft for exceedances of approved engine coolant temperature limits due to installation of an unapproved design.

According to the bulletin, the  reported conditions are the result of an insufficiently communicated engine design change which altered the engine/aircraft interfaces by substituting the previous cylinder head temperature (CHT) measurement (limit temperature 135°C/150°C) with a coolant temperature (CT) measurement (limit temperature 120°C).

EASA says that If affected engines or cylinder heads have been or are installed during production or maintenance without concurrent installation of an adequate aircraft TC/STC holder approved modification, thus altering the previous aircraft CHT indicator/indicator markings/aircraft flight manual limitations, then coolant temperature with a maximum engine operating limit of 120°C (valid for engines operated with water diluted glycol coolant) is displayed on a CHT indicator with a typical limit marking (red radial/range) of more than 120°C. The pilot is therefore not able to identify coolant limit exceedances, subsequent loss of coolant and impending engine failure during flight.

Also, for engines operated with approved waterless coolant, installation of the affected engines needs to be accompanied by adequate aircraft TC/STC holder approved modifications to assure safe aircraft operation.

Installation of affected engines and spare parts without concurrent incorporation of aircraft TC/STC holder approved modifications, even if unintended and unnoticed by production or maintenance, constitutes an unapproved aircraft modification.

Investigations are ongoing at BRP-Powertrain and with aircraft TC/STC holders to identify the extent of unapproved installations and to evaluate potential mandatory airworthiness actions.

(Image provided by EASA)

FMI: Full Bulletin

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.25): Circle To Runway (Runway Number)

Circle To Runway (Runway Number) Used by ATC to inform the pilot that he/she must circle to land because the runway in use is other than the runway aligned with the instrument appr>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.05.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: De Havilland DHC-1

At Altitude Of About 250-300 Ft Agl, The Airplane Experienced A Total Loss Of Engine Power On November 6, 2024, at 1600 central standard time, a De Havilland DHC-1, N420TD, was inv>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Boeing Dreamliner -- Historic First Flight Coverage

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Three Hour Flight Was 'Flawless' -- At Least, Until Mother Nature Intervened For anyone who loves the aviation business, this was a VERY good day. Afte>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC