American Surrenders On Bag Fees For Military Personnel | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.14.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.15.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.16.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.17.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Thu, Aug 14, 2008

American Surrenders On Bag Fees For Military Personnel

Will Waive Fees For Third Piece Of Checked Luggage

What a difference a couple days -- and highly-focused public outrage -- can make. On Thursday, American Airlines bowed to recent outcry surrounding the Fort Worth-based airline's practice of charging active military personnel a fee to check their baggage when shipping out.

As ANN reported, the Veterans of Foreign Wars -- and practically everyone else -- slammed American this week, after news surfaced two soldiers shipping out from Texas were charged $400 between them to check their duffel bags. American spokesman Tim Wagner's explanation -- "Because the soldiers don't pay a dime, our waiver of the fees amounts to a discount to the military, not a discount to soldiers" -- fell flat.

American says it will now waive fees for a third checked bag for active service members. Fees for first and second checked bags have always been waived, according to the airline.

"The previous policy allowed active military personnel, traveling on duty, to travel with up to 190 pounds of luggage at no charge, including a 100 pound checked bag, a 50 pound checked bag, and a 40 pound carry-on bag," the airline tersely noted. "Only one other airline waives first and second bag fees for off-duty, active service members, and no airline allows as much free baggage by weight as American Airlines."

The new waiver policy for military personnel begins immediately... and American says in the future it will work closely with the Department of Defense on similar issues, presumably to keep its corporate brand out of the public's bullseye.

"We always understood that soldiers traveling on duty were reimbursed by the military for the fees on required excess baggage. However, after recently hearing of the burden the military reimbursement process put on soldiers traveling to war zones, the choice for us to forgo payment for a third checked bag from the Department of Defense was clear," said Tom Del Valle, American's Senior Vice President -- Airport Services.

"We appreciate and marvel at the bravery and sacrifice our military personnel exhibit daily," Del Valle added. "Anything we can do to support them and honor them is a top priority for American Airlines."

Incidentally, its release announcing the change, American billed itself as "the leading airline in supporting active service members..." without a trace of irony.

FMI: www.aa.com/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.15.25): Charted Visual Flight Procedure Approach

Charted Visual Flight Procedure Approach An approach conducted while operating on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan which authorizes the pilot of an aircraft to proceed >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.15.25)

“When l became the Secretary of Defense, I committed to rebuild our military to match threats to capabilities. Drones are the biggest battlefield innovation in a generation, >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.15.25)

Aero Linx: Stearman Restorers Association Welcome to the Stearman Restorers Association. The Stearman Restorers Association is an independent “Not for Profit” 501C-3 Co>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Kjelsrud Gary Kitfox

Airplane Exhibited A Partial Loss Of Engine Power When It Was About Halfway Down The Runway Analysis: The pilot of the experimental amateur-built airplane was departing from his pr>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cessna A150L

The Flight Path Was Consistent With Low-Altitude Maneuvering On June 18, 2025, about 0922 mountain standard time, a Cessna A150L airplane, N6436F, was substantially damaged when it>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC