Judge Awards Damages, Legal Fees To Skydiving Company | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-09.23.24

Airborne-NextGen-10.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-10.02.24

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-10.03.24

Airborne-Unlimited-09.27.24

Sat, Aug 01, 2015

Judge Awards Damages, Legal Fees To Skydiving Company

Citizens For Quiet Skies Lose Court Case Against Mile-Hi Skydiving

Colorado Judge Judith LaBuda has found in favor of Mile-Hi Skydiving in a case brought by a citizens group complaining about noise from the company's airplanes.

The Times Call newspaper reports that earlier in July, Judge LaBude had awarded Mile-Hi nearly $68,000 in damages in the case brought by Citizens for Quiet Skies. Now, the judge says the citizen's group must also pay the skydiving company $48,000 in legal fees as well.

The Judge dismissed all but the negligence and nuisance claims, as well as dismissing the Citizens for Quiet Skies organization as a plaintiff. Attorneys for Mile-Hi had said that those complaints had been lodged in an attempt by the group to make the lawsuit "as difficult and expensive as possible."

In her summary ordering the payment of attorney's fees, LaBuda wrote that "The Court finds Citizens (for Quiet Skies') claims for damages to be substantially frivolous and groundless and lacking any factual basis."

Citizens for Quiet Skies organizer Kimberly Gibbs, said the group was planning to file a motion to reconsider the amount, which had been reduced from $58,420 requested by the attorney representing Mile-Hi, to $47,984. They have also filed with the Colorado Court of Appeals, asking for a review of LaBuda's original decision in favor of the skydiving business.

FMI: www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/County/Contact.cfm?County_ID=62

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.02.24): Execute Missed Approach

Execute Missed Approach Instructions issued to a pilot making an instrument approach which means continue inbound to the missed approach point and execute the missed approach proce>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.02.24)

“NORAD aircraft flew a safe and disciplined intercept of Russian Military Aircraft in the Alaska ADIZ... The conduct of one Russian Su-35 was unsafe, unprofessional, and enda>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Air Tractor Inc AT-602

Airplane Was Flying West Along The North Edge Of The Field When The Outboard 3 Ft Of The Right Wing Impacted A Power Transformer On September 5, 2024, about 1014 mountain daylight >[...]

NTSB Prelim: Boeing A75L3

The Wreckage Was Located At The Base Of An Approximate 100 Ft Tall Tree On September 6, 2024, about 1259 Pacific daylight time, a Boeing A75L3, N53466, was substantially damaged wh>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC