As a direct result of
pressure from AOPA, the FAA has lowered the altitude of a moored
balloon experiment and raised the safety level for pilots operating
in the Lancaster, Pa., area.
AOPA sent a scathing letter to the FAA just before New Years
over a Millersville University experiment that involved a moored
balloon at 3,600' MSL, above the minimum obstacle clearance
altitude (MOCA) for several Victor airways in that area. Notice of
the experiment was published only 10 days before the experiment was
set to begin, and the public comment period didn't end until after
the experiment was scheduled to be complete.
A new NOTAM issued Thursday lowers the balloon's permitted
altitude to 2,600' MSL, and raises the MOCA and minimum en route
altitudes (MEAs) for those airways to 3,700' MSL.
"Even though we asked that this study be halted immediately, we
believe the safety issues have been adequately addressed," said
Heidi Williams, AOPA manager of air traffic. "But we hope that in
the future, the FAA will pay closer attention to these kinds of
safety details, and will do a better job of notifying pilots and
allowing for public comment."
Text Of AOPA Letter To FAA
The Aircraft Owners and
Pilots Association (AOPA), representing over 400,000 general
aviation pilots, is opposed to the proposal by Millersville
University, Department of Earth Science plan for a January 2, 2004
launch of a moored balloon to an altitude of 3,600 msl for
atmospheric studies. AOPA bases this opposition on potential safety
impacts and a lack of advanced notice to pilots.
The altitudes of the lit moored balloon as proposed in the
study conflict with the 2,600ft MSL Minimum Obstruction Clearance
Altitude (MOCA) for V93 and V457. In an emergency descent from the
4,500ft MSL Minimum En-Route Instrument Altitude (MEA) to the MOCA
altitude, the moored balloon creates a serious collision hazard. In
addition, the moored balloon would conflict with the MEA for V469
currently at 3,000ft MSL. Clearly, there are safety issues that
must be addressed before the moored balloon study
commences.
AOPA is also very concerned with the lack of advanced
notification of the atmospheric studies. Additional time is
necessary for users to adequately comment on the associated impacts
created by the moored balloon before a study can commence.
Receiving comments after-the-fact does not solve safety issues
created by the moored balloon and will result in compromising the
safety of many pilots transiting the airspace.
We request that the FAA take immediate action to prohibit
the use of the National Airspace for the upcoming atmospheric
studies until the safety issues can be resolved.
Sincerely,
Brent Hart, Government Analyst