FAA Sued In Connection With 2015 Accident In North Carolina | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-SpecialEpisode-12.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Nov 22, 2017

FAA Sued In Connection With 2015 Accident In North Carolina

Says Controllers Received Insufficient Training In Recognition And Handling Of Emergencies

The estate of Michael M. Apfelbaum and his wife, Christine have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the FAA in connection with an accident which occurred September 4, 2015 that fatally injured the couple.

The Apfelbaums and Christine's father were aboard a Beechcraft A36 Bonanza attempting an instrument landing at Piedmont Triad International Airport in Greensboro, NC when the accident occurred. Michael Apfelbaum was the PIC of the airplane. In its probable cause report, which is not admissible in court, the NTSB determined that the accident was likely caused by the pilot's spatial disorientation during the approach, but also said that the controllers lacked sufficient training to recognize and handle emergency situations.

The report said that "incorrect controller actions likely aggravated" the spacial disorientation. "The FAA training did not properly prepare the controllers involved in this accident to recognize and effectively respond to disorientation scenarios," the report states. The plane stalled and spun into the ground after a controller told the pilot to climb, according to the report. All three on board were fatally injured.

Penn Live reports that the estates are seeking unspecified damages in the suit, including lost earnings. The court documents indicate that controllers did not correct the pilot's incorrect reading of his heading, and his statement that he was disoriented was not recognized as an emergency. The suit contends that the controllers should have told him to level the wings and then climb out of the clouds.

(Image from file. Not accident airplane)

FMI: Original report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.19.25): Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF)

Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF) The frequency band between 300 and 3,000 MHz. The bank of radio frequencies used for military air/ground voice communications. In some instances this may >[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22T

During The 7 Second Descent, There Was Another TAWS Alert At Which Time The Engine Remained At Full Power On October 24, 2025 at 2115 mountain daylight time, a Cirrus SR22T, N740TS>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Red Tail Project--Carrying the Torch of the Tuskegee Airmen

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Educational Organization Aims to Inspire by Sharing Tuskegee Story Founding leader Don Hinz summarized the Red Tail Project’s mission in simple, >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.19.25)

“This feels like an important step since space travel for people with disabilities is still in its very early days... I’m so thankful and hope it inspires a change in m>[...]

Airborne 12.17.25: Skydiver Hooks Tail, Cooper Rotax Mount, NTSB v NDAA

Also: New Katanas, Kern County FD Training, IndiGo’s Botched Roster, MGen. Leavitt Named ERAU Dean The Australian Transportation Safety Bureau (ATSB) has wrapped up its inves>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC