Massachusetts Considers Reinstatement Tax On Airplane Sales, Parts | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Thu, Aug 27, 2015

Massachusetts Considers Reinstatement Tax On Airplane Sales, Parts

Tax Was Abolished In 2002

The Massachusetts legislature is considering reinstating a 6.25 percent sales tax on airplane sales, parts, and maintenance that was abolished in 2002.

Some in the current legislature are calling the tax break a "giveaway for wealthy executives with corporate jets." But the aviation industry counters that bringing back the tax would drive business to other states, and small airports would be the hardest hit.

The Gloucester Times reports that former Governor Deval Patrick had tried to reinstate the tax during the recession, but the proposal did not gain traction in the Democrat-controlled legislature. And even if the current legislature is successful in passing the tax, it could be vetoed by current Governor Charlie Baker (pictured), a Republican.

Baker spokesman Billy Pitman said the Governor does not support increasing taxes on businesses in the state, but he would "review any legislation that should it reach his desk."

Dave Dinneen, president of the Massachusetts Airport Management Association, said that the industry is supportive of spending money on education, but it should not be taken at the expense of a growing sector that supports 124,000 jobs statewide and has an $11.9 billion economic impact on the state.

While Rep. Cory Atkins, (D-Concord) said he "can't understand why this exemption has survived so long" because it is a " generous tax break for the rich, while we’re cutting every year to balance the budget," Sen. Barbara L’Italien, (D-Andover), however, said that there is a strong argument for keeping the exemption, particularly for airports near the border with states that do not charge a tax. “These airports must compete with other states for business, so we need to give them whatever competitive advantage we can,” she said. “They provide a vital service for us, and we need them to stay open.”

FMI: https://malegislature.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC