Tue, Sep 09, 2003
Required Maintenance
Training Necessary
The Professional Aviation Maintenance Association (PAMA) is
calling on maintenance professionals and others in the aviation
industry to recognize the need for required training programs and
training regulations for all aviation maintenance professionals.
These requirements will ensure a higher level of professionalism,
bolster respect for maintenance professionals, and overall minimize
maintenance error.
Calling for FAA Intervention, Testing
The Federal Aviation Regulations are quite specific in training
requirements for pilots, flight engineers, flight attendants, and
dispatchers. Professionals in those positions must receive approved
training at the time of their employment and regular recurrent
training thereafter. These universally accepted standards of
professionalism are appropriate, but missing for maintenance
technicians. PAMA President Brian Finnegan is calling for the
completion of the circle of aviation safety: "It is necessary to
equally apply these standards to aviation maintenance professionals
as well."
PAMA points to three
recent aviation accidents as examples: Alaska Airlines Flight 261,
Swissair Flight 111 and Air Midwest Flight 5481. In each of these
tragedies, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) pointed
to specific problems with maintenance. In Flight 261, improper maintenance left a
critical jackscrew without proper lubrication. The NTSB said that
poor training contributed. In Flight 111 (recovery photo
shown), wire bundles were clamped improperly. The Flight 5481 crash in Charlotte appears
to be the result of improper on-the-job training. Finnegan
emphasizes, "It's clear that the time is right for FAA to apply
standardized training requirements to ensure the airworthiness of
our fleet and the safety of our passengers."
PAMA asks that all maintenance technicians and other industry
professionals assist FAA in achieving this important safety goal.
Industry and government representatives have gathered to rewrite
some of the operating regulations that govern commercial aviation.
An Aeronautical Rulemaking Committee (ARC) has been convened to
review FAR Parts 135/125. The far-reaching impact of this review
will also affect many other regulations, including Parts 121, 91,
119, and 25. PAMA is a member of the both the ARC Steering
Committee and Airworthiness Working Group.
PAMA solicits the supportive input from all aviation
professionals in assisting FAA to achieve this ambitious goal.
More News
Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]
Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]
From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]
Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]
Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]