Bush Administration Wants To Avert Full-Blown Pension
Crisis
If bankrupt United
Airlines bails out on its pension obligations to employees, the
Bush administration is worried that it could touch off a full-blown
pension crisis in corporate America. The Rocky Mountain News
reports the White House is now considering legislation that would
prevent the airline from reneging on its promise to take care of
its retirees.
"I think it is very likely they are looking at legislative
options," said Gary Ford, former general counsel for the Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corp.. He's now an attorney for the Groom Law
Group in Washington (DC), a firm that specializes in employee
benefits law. He was quoted by the Rocky Mountain News.
White House spokesman Jim Morrell, however, reportedly declined
to say whether legislation is pending, but did admit to the News
that the administration is "concerned" about the welfare of
United's four pension programs.
But it's unclear just what the White House can do to help -- at
least, in the case of United's bankruptcy. It's an election year
and United hopes to clear federal bankruptcy court by the end of
December.
The airline has said it will probably have to scrap the four
pension funds. Already, it's stopped payments to them while in
bankruptcy. For that, United has drawn the wrath of its unions,
most notably the Machinists.
"We don't believe that a
company that has $2 billion in cash and over $5 billion in assets
should be terminating pension plans," said Machinists Vice
President Robert Roach, Jr. in an interview with the Rocky Mountain
News. "We don't think the PBGC (Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation) was established to pay pensions for companies with
those kinds of assets."
Indeed, these are white-knuckle days at the PBGC. If United
kills its pension funds, the government-backed corporation would be
liable for $6.4 billion in benefits -- the biggest potential
pay-out in its 30-year history. Even worse, a pay-out would leave
$1.9 in UAL pension benefits unfunded.
"It's an extremely difficult decision for United to make
because, in some respects, they are damned if they do and damned if
they don't," Phoenix attorney Thomas J. Salerno told the newspaper.
Salerno is a Phoenix lawyer who heads the restructuring practice at
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey. "If they don't do it, and there are
huge liabilities for funding, it will put a challenge to getting
any sort of financing to exit bankruptcy.
"At the same time," he continued, "they're going to put
themselves in a position where their employees hate their
guts."