DOT Levies $250,000 Fine Against British Airways | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.28.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.29.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.30.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Tue, Oct 02, 2012

DOT Levies $250,000 Fine Against British Airways

Cited For Violating Price Advertising, International Baggage Compensation Rules

British Airways violated the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) rules on full-fare advertising as well an international treaty on reimbursements for mishandled baggage, the agency said Monday. The Department fined the carrier $250,000 and ordered it to cease and desist from further violations.

“Consumers deserve fair treatment from airlines when it comes to price advertising and being reimbursed for lost, damaged or stolen baggage. To surprise consumers at the last minute of the purchase process with additional unadvertised costs is deceptive and unacceptable,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said. “At DOT we will continue to make sure airlines treat their customers with the respect they deserve.”

DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that British Airways violated a number of the Department’s original price advertising requirements that were in place prior to the strengthened full-fare advertising rule that took effect in January 2012. The carrier promoted award travel in emails and on websites without providing disclosure of taxes and government fees through a hyperlink or other appropriate method. It also failed to include carrier-imposed charges, such as fuel surcharges, in the award prices. For example, one promotion in connection with British Airways credit cards advertised two tickets to London without disclosing that, in order to obtain reward travel tickets, passengers were required to pay mandatory surcharges imposed by the carrier that could total as much as $600 per person.

British Airways also published a number of advertisements about one-way fares that were available only by purchasing a round-trip ticket. In some ads, the notice of the round-trip requirement was in small type and beneath an illustration. This violated the Department’s enforcement policy stating that notices of round-trip purchase requirements for each-way fares must be clear and conspicuous and be placed next to the advertised fare the first time it is shown.

British Airways also violated the Montreal Convention, an international agreement setting rules for international air travel, by its stated policy not to pay compensation for loss, damage or theft from checked baggage of certain fragile or valuable items such as money, jewelry, electronic devices or silverware. The Convention allows carriers to limit their liability for lost baggage or items in baggage to just over $1,700 per person in U.S. dollars, an amount that fluctuates based on currency conversion rates, but also states that carriers are liable for loss or theft of all types of checked baggage.

Monday's penalty follows a notice issued by the Enforcement Office on March 26, 2009, reminding carriers of the requirements of the Montreal Convention.  

FMI: www.dot.gov

 


Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.30.25)

Aero Linx: Aviators Code Initiative (ACI) Innovative tools advancing aviation safety and offering a vision of excellence for aviators. The ACI materials are for use by aviation pra>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Agile Aero’s Jeff Greason--Disruptive Aerospace Innovations

From 2016 (YouTube Edition): Who You Gonna Call When You Have a Rocket Engine that Needs a Spacecraft? While at EAA AirVenture 2016, ANN CEO and Editor-In-Chief, Jim Campbell, sat >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.30.25)

"In my opinion, if this isn't an excessive fine, I don't know what is... The odds are good that we're gonna be seeking review in the United States Supreme Court. So we gotta muster>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.30.25): Expedite

Expedite Used by ATC when prompt compliance is required to avoid the development of an imminent situation. Expedite climb/descent normally indicates to a pilot that the approximate>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC