Juneau, Feds Can't Agree On Runway Plan | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-09.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
09.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-09.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-09.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-09.12.25

Thu, Apr 21, 2005

Juneau, Feds Can't Agree On Runway Plan

Alaskan City's Airport Funding Could Be At Stake

The engineered-material arresting system has so far been a success, saving five aircraft from expensive and perhaps even deadly mishaps. The crushed material at the end of runways is designed to slow a speeding aircraft to a stop without causing severe damage, when they might otherwise run off the end of a runway and into whatever lies beyond.

So why don't airport officials in Juneau, AK, want to install it?

So far, 15 airports nationwide have installed the collapsible cement blocks in runway safety areas that are 1,000 feet long and 500 feet wide. As Juneau International Airport officials contemplate how to comply with the requirement for a safety area, they're studying five options -- two of which include an engineered materials system.

But even though the FAA says it's a proven system, Juneau International Airport Board Chairman Ron Swanson isn't sure about EMAS. He's specifically worried about the weather.

"This is untried in Alaska," Swanson told the Juneau Empire. "There are two major reasons to cause accidents: wind shear and pilot misjudgment. A standard runway safety area is longer and can protect the airplanes and its occupants."

Swanson said he's specifically worried about Alaska's bitter cold in trying to maintain an engineered material safety area. "You cannot plow snow with a truck on it. This thing would cave in," Swanson said. "You have to have special equipment to remove snow."

The five options are part of the FAA's Environmental Impact Study, set for release on Monday. While two of the options involve the new arresting system, two are designed in the traditional sense and one is a combination of both.

The EIS will be the subject of community hearings in Juneau on June 1st and 2nd. If airport officials refuse to comply with the FAA's directives on the subject, they stand to lose their federal airport grants -- although there's no clear indication that's even being contemplated at this point.

FMI: www.juneau.lib.ak.us/airport/index.php

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: UAvionix - Transitioning Between Manned & Unmanned Technologies

From 2017 (YouTube Edition): ADS-B For Airplanes And Drones… ADS-B technology developed by uAvionix has come full circle. The company began with a device developed for manne>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (09.14.25): Dead Reckoning

Dead Reckoning Dead reckoning, as applied to flying, is the navigation of an airplane solely by means of computations based on airspeed, course, heading, wind direction, and speed,>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (09.14.25)

"The next great technological revolution in aviation is here. The United States will lead the way, and doing so will cement America’s status as a global leader in transportat>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (09.14.25)

Aero Linx: The Mooney Mite Site Dedicated to the Mooney M-18 Mite, "The Most Personal Airplane," and to supporting Mite owners everywhere. The Mooney M-18 Mite is a single-place, l>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 09.09.25: Textron Nixes ePlane, Joby L/D Flt, Swift Approval

Also: Space Command Moves, Alpine Eagle, Duffy Names Amit Kshatriya, Sikorsky-CAL FIRE Collab Textron eAviation is putting the development of its Nexus electric vertical takeoff an>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC