Is The F-35 Worth the Price? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Fri, Oct 25, 2024

Is The F-35 Worth the Price?

Jet Continues to Lag Behind Combat Readiness Marks

Further studies from the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) have determined that, after six years and over $12 billion in investments, the F-35 Lightning stealth fighter is still not combat-ready. This raises concerns regarding the fifth-gen jet’s ability to anchor down American air superiority.

As a part of a tactical aviation readiness report, the GAO tracked how closely US aircraft were meeting their intended mission-capable rates from 2018 to 2023. This so-called ‘mission-capable rate’ is a percentage of the “total time when the aircraft can fly and perform at least one mission” and is “used to assess the health and readiness of an aircraft fleet,” the GAO explained.

In its analysis, the GAO determined that the Air Force’s F-35A "did not meet its mission capable goals in any of the years we reviewed.” It also reported that the F-35B and F-35C variants, operated by the Marine Corps and Navy, failed to perform up to standards during the entire six-year period.

This means that the $12 billion used on maintenance and development efforts is still not producing favorable results. The majority of the funding, $7.46 billion, was used on the Air Force fleet, with $2.75 billion directed to the Marines and the last $1.87 billion being for the Navy.

The F-35 isn’t alone; the F-22 Raptor, EA-18G Growler, F/A-18 A-D Hornets, AV-8B Harrier, and F-15E Strike Eagle also didn’t meet expectations for all six years. The F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, F-16D, F-15D, and A-10 Warthog missed the mark 5 years out of six. The F-16C and F-15C were half successful, being on target with goals for three years.

"None of the 15 tactical aircraft variants met their mission capable goals in fiscal year 2023," the GAO reported.

“The F-35 is proven in combat and performing for 14 military services around the world today,” stated Lt. Gen. Mike Schmidt, who serves as director and program executive officer of the F-35 Joint Program Office. “With this in mind, I am not satisfied with our readiness today — and our team is doing everything in its power to drive availability to levels our users expect.”

FMI: www.gao.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.25): Circle To Runway (Runway Number)

Circle To Runway (Runway Number) Used by ATC to inform the pilot that he/she must circle to land because the runway in use is other than the runway aligned with the instrument appr>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.05.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: De Havilland DHC-1

At Altitude Of About 250-300 Ft Agl, The Airplane Experienced A Total Loss Of Engine Power On November 6, 2024, at 1600 central standard time, a De Havilland DHC-1, N420TD, was inv>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Boeing Dreamliner -- Historic First Flight Coverage

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Three Hour Flight Was 'Flawless' -- At Least, Until Mother Nature Intervened For anyone who loves the aviation business, this was a VERY good day. Afte>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC