Supreme Court Won't Step In Over Air Corridors | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sat, Jan 23, 2010

Supreme Court Won't Step In Over Air Corridors

SCOTUS Declines To Hear Rockland County NY Case

The U.S. Supreme Court said Tuesday it would not consider a case brought by Rockland County, New York, in an attempt to block implementation of an FAA plan to re-direct air traffic. The county held that the new plan would send hundreds of additional flights over the region every day.

Rockland County sits under a proposed air corridor for flights inbound to Newark Liberty International Airport. But the appeal was considered a long shot from the beginning because there had to be legal deficiencies in the lower court's decision to warrant a review by the Supreme Court. It's not enough that the county disagreed with the lower court's ruling.

"While not unexpected, I'm extremely disappointed that the Supreme Court would not hear our case," said County Executive C.Scott Vanderhoef. "I still believe that we have a strong case that the FAA erred in its approach to the redesign."

The Lower Hudson Valley online news site lohud.com reports that Vanderhoef and Democratic U.S. Representative Eliot Engel contend that the FAA did not follow proper procedures for assessing the environmental impact and noise mitigation in designing the new corridors. The FAA wants to implement a complete re-design of air traffic the New York-New Jersey-Philadelphia metro area. Currently, flights into Newark approach from the west over Orange county. The redesign would place as many as 600 additional flights a day over Rockland County.

The decision by SCOTUS leaves no other legal recourse for the county, but Vanderhoef and Engel said they would now pursue a political tactic in an effort to stop implementation of the new air traffic corridors.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC