Suspicious? UAV Company Fined By The FAA Involved In Lawsuit Against The Agency | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.03.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.05.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Affordable Flying Expo Tickets (Discount Code: AFE2025): CLICK HERE!
LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall, 1800ET, 11.07.25: www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Oct 08, 2015

Suspicious? UAV Company Fined By The FAA Involved In Lawsuit Against The Agency

SkyPan International Fined $1.9 Million For Alleged 'Unauthorized Operations'

Tuesday, the FAA announced that it was proposing a $1.9 million fine against Chicago-based UAV photography company SkyPan International. It was the largest fine ever imposed against a UAV operator ... by $1,890,000.

SkyPan is one of several companies that is involved in a lawsuit against the FAA that hold that the agency can't make UAV operations illegal in the absence of formal small UAV regulations. The FAA's Congressionally-mandated deadline for such regulations came and went on September 30th.

The website motherboard.vice.com reports that SkyPan has been engaged in aerial photography for 27 years using both manned and now unmanned aircraft. It currently holds a Section 333 exemption for commercial UAV operation granted in April of this year.

But the FAA alleges that prior to obtaining the Section 333 exemption, Skypan flew at least 65 "unauthorized operations in some of our most congested airspace and heavily populated cities, violating airspace regulations and various operating rules. These operations were illegal and not without risk." Many were said to be violations of Class B airspace in New York and Chicago.

The FAA does not list specific instances of alleged violations in its letter to SkyPan, but does appear to have such detailed information.

SkyPan told motherboard.vice.com that it was still digesting the FAA's letter, and could not comment.

(Image from file)

FMI: http://skypanintl.com, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.05.25: Tesla Flying Car?, Jepp/ForeFlight Sold, A220 Troubles

Also: AFE25 Tickets!, Jamaica Recovery, E-Aircraft at Boeing Fld, Diamond DA50 RG Cert Elon Musk is once again promising the impossible…this time, in the form of a Tesla tha>[...]

Airborne 11.07.25: Affordable Expo Starts!, Duffy Worries, Isaacman!

Also: Louisville UPS Crash Aftermath, Taiwan Boosts Pilot Pool, Spartan Acquires, DON’T MISS the MOSAIC Town Hall! This three-day Affordable Flying Expo brings together indoo>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.05.25)

“Our strategic partnership with AutoFlight, backed by their substantial technological expertise and tangible advancements in eVTOL airworthiness, represents a significant mil>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.05.25)

Aero Linx: British Gliding Association (BGA) The British Gliding Association is the governing body for the sport of gliding in the UK and members are the 76 clubs that provide glid>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22

While Descending Toward ASN, He Advanced The Throttle, But The Engine Did Not Respond On October 2, 2025, at 1126 central daylight time, a Cirrus SR22, N812SE, was substantially da>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC