Dronetag Calls Out Dubai for Copycat Design | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-08.25.25

Airborne-NextGen-08.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-08.27.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-08.28.25

AirborneUnlimited-08.22.25

Sun, May 11, 2025

Dronetag Calls Out Dubai for Copycat Design

Manufacturer’s Concerns Met With Silence by the Dubai CAA

Prague-based start-up Dronetag has confronted the Dubai Civil Aviation Authority for allegedly selling an identical copy of its remote ID device, the Mini. Despite its legal team reaching out several times, they have not received a response.

“This issue goes far beyond Dronetag,” the company stated. “It raises serious concerns for the entire drone industry, especially for startups and innovators working hard to bring innovative solutions to the market.”

Dronetag is an EU-funded and NATO-supported manufacturer that produces a variety of technologies for drones. Several of these are remote ID devices, which serve as a sort of digital license plate to broadcast the drone's location data to other parties. It plays a similar role to ADS-B with aircraft by providing improvements to airspace awareness and collision avoidance.

One of the remote ID devices that Dronetag offers is the Mini. This is an FAA-approved, pocket-sized device compliant with both direct and network remote ID standards.

The start-up recently noticed a product on the Dubai Civil Aviation Authority’s website, called the SpotMe, that bears an uncanny resemblance to the Mini. Dronetag claims that the only apparent difference between the pair is one extra LED indicator and poor rendering of the SpotMe. The SpotMe remote ID is also tied to the ‘DCAA Monitoring System’ mobile app, which allegedly contains graphics and product images that are owned by Dronetag.

“The fact that a national aviation authority can promote a copycat product and then ignore multiple attempts at dialogue should alarm everyone who values fair competition, IP protection, and responsible governance in emerging tech sectors,” Dronetag continued.

In response, Dronetag sent the DCAA an official complaint detailing each violation. So far, however, the authority has responded with radio silence. If going public with the issue doesn’t get them any ground, the Dronetag legal team is prepared to make things ugly.

FMI: https://dronetag.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (08.28.25)

“We have seen astounding demand for the G800, and the entire Gulfstream team is excited to begin making deliveries to our customers. The G800 is entering service with extraor>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (08.28.25)

Aero Linx: Recreational Aviation Australia (RAAus) Recreational Aviation Australia is progressively working towards improving safety outcomes through a holistic approach to safety >[...]

Classic Klyde Morris (08.25.25)

Classic Klyde Morris From 11.07.16 (and Remembering Bob...) FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 08.25.25: Zenith Homecoming, VP Racing, Affordable Flying Expo 2025

Also: GADFLY AI-Driven Engine Analysis, Knockoff Iranian Drones, Russian Surveillance, 40 NASA Missions Chopped This year’s Zenith Homecoming event will soon be taking off at>[...]

Airborne 08.22.25: ARC Spinoff, Nat'l Championship Air Races, Hawkins Accident

Also: H55 Completes American Tour, Robinson Trade-Ins, Retired AV-8B Harrier, NS-35 Mission Organizers of the iconic annual Air Race Classic will soon be opening registration for t>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC