Northrop Grumman Says KC-45A Won On Its Merits, Period | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.02.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.03.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.04.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.05.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.06.25

Tue, Apr 22, 2008

Northrop Grumman Says KC-45A Won On Its Merits, Period

Disputes Boeing Claims Of Bias In USAF Decision

In the weeks ahead, look for both Boeing and Northrop Grumman to step up their public statements regarding the US Air Force KC-X contract bid. The Government Accountability Office is due to rule on or before June 19 on a protest filed by the American planemaker, over the bid going to the Airbus-sourced KC-45A.

On Tuesday, Northrop Grumman released the first of what it says will be a regular series of "Why We Won" releases, to "provide detailed examples of why Northrop Grumman was selected, drawing on facts listed in a redacted version of a protected Air Force selection document."

The first of the series, entitled "Mission Capability," notes the Air Force determined the larger, A330-derived KC-45A provided several advantages over the smaller 767-based Boeing offering, including the ability to haul more fuel, and distribute it to more planes.

According to Northrop, the Air Force found the KC-45A provided "Better fuel offloads at all distances from bases," "Better air refueling efficiency," "Better offload rate and receive rate," and has "A greater boom envelope vs. Boeing."

In a written explanation of the Air Force thinking on this subject, Sue Payton, the Air Force's chief acquisition officer, said the USAF determined the KC-45A provided "significant refueling advantages," adding the plane's "refueling capability was compelling to my decision."

"Northrop Grumman's offer was a superior solution to the air refueling requirement, which is a key performance parameter," Payton wrote.

As ANN reported Monday, Boeing's defenders in Congress want the KC-X award to be overturned... despite what Northrop terms "the clear inferiority" of the Boeing offering, compared to the KC-45A.

Northrop also asserts Boeing disagrees with the Air Force formula for air refueling efficiency, that determined the KC-45A was six percent more efficient in relation to fuel delivered versus fuel consumed -- "so [Boeing] invented their own.

"There's a word for that, but it's not patriotism," the Wall Street Journal recently wrote, according to Northrop.

FMI: www.northropgrumman.com/kc45/, www.globaltanker.com

Advertisement

More News

Citation Operators Get Another Flight Data Connection for QA

LinxUs System Adds Capabilities for Data-Driven Operators Textron Aviation announced another option for operators processing their post-flight data, adding interoperability with GE>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.01.25)

Aero Linx: The de Havilland Moth Club Ltd The de Havilland Moth Club evolved from a belief that an association of owners and operators of Moth aeroplanes should be formed to create>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Bellanca 8GCBC

(Pilot) Inadvertently Applied Excessive Braking Action, And The Airplane Nosed Over Analysis: The pilot reported that, while landing at a remote, rough and uneven airstrip in a tai>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.01.25)

“MCADT is committed to rapidly integrating armed first-person view drones into the FMF, enhancing small-unit lethality and providing organic capabilities that warfighters cur>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: High-Speed Match-up - Venom and GE Rebirth A Legend

From 2017 (YouTube Edition): Major Engine Supplier Joins Forces With Small Aircraft Manufacturer… GE recently made an agreement with Venom Aircraft to supply engines for the>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC