Boeing Gets A Break | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.14.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.15.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.16.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.17.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Mon, May 19, 2003

Boeing Gets A Break

Judge Limits Damages In Alaska Airlines Suit

In the wake of the deadly Alaska Airlines Flight 261 crash three years ago, there's this: Boeing, which absorbed McDonnell-Douglas, maker of the MD-83, won't have to pay punitive damages if it loses a huge lawsuit related to the incident.

The crash of Alaska Airlines Flight 261 in January, 2000, killed all 88 people on board. The jetliner was on its way from Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, to San Francisco (CA) when it plunged into the Pacific off the coast of Los Angeles. Poor maintenance of the jackscrew, a mechanical component that actuates/trims the horizontal stabilizer, was blamed in the NTSB report on the crash.

Boeing: Happy With Ruling
Plaintiffs: Not So Much

"Boeing is pleased with Judge Breyer's ruling," said Boeing lawyer Robert Scoular. What it means is that, should Boeing lose the multi-million dollar lawsuit it faces, along with Alaska Airlines, the airplane-maker won't have to pay an extra punishment fee to the plaintiffs.

San Francisco Federal Judge Charles Breyer said the "record is insufficient to support a finding by a reasonable jury that Boeing's conduct manifested reckless or callous disregard for the rights of others," according to an Associated Press report. But Boeing isn't out of the woods yet - it's still a defendant in the case. Judge Breyer refused to dismiss Boeing as a party in the suit, saying there was a "genuine dispute as to the Boeing defendant's negligence."

Frank Pitre, a lawyer representing families of the victims in the lawsuit, said, "Boeing dodged the bullet." He contended the Chicago-based aerospace company's faulty design of the MD-83 (above)contributed to the 2000 crash. Boeing, in turn, said the aircraft wouldn't have had any problems, had the jackscrew been greased (it wasn't and it should have been) and examined for excessive wear and tear.

Alaska Airlines wouldn't comment on the Boeing statement. However, the carrier did agree to admit it was liable for the 88 deaths and move straight to the penalty phase of the trial. It's not clear whether Boeing will do the same.

Of the 88 victims' families, 69 have settled out of court.

FMI: www.alaskaair.com, www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.15.25): Charted Visual Flight Procedure Approach

Charted Visual Flight Procedure Approach An approach conducted while operating on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan which authorizes the pilot of an aircraft to proceed >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.15.25)

“When l became the Secretary of Defense, I committed to rebuild our military to match threats to capabilities. Drones are the biggest battlefield innovation in a generation, >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.15.25)

Aero Linx: Stearman Restorers Association Welcome to the Stearman Restorers Association. The Stearman Restorers Association is an independent “Not for Profit” 501C-3 Co>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Kjelsrud Gary Kitfox

Airplane Exhibited A Partial Loss Of Engine Power When It Was About Halfway Down The Runway Analysis: The pilot of the experimental amateur-built airplane was departing from his pr>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cessna A150L

The Flight Path Was Consistent With Low-Altitude Maneuvering On June 18, 2025, about 0922 mountain standard time, a Cessna A150L airplane, N6436F, was substantially damaged when it>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC