NBAA: FAA's Elimination of BARR Amounts to a 'Paparazzi Protection Rule' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-
10.14.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.15.25

Airborne-NextGen-10.16.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Sun, May 29, 2011

NBAA: FAA's Elimination of BARR Amounts to a 'Paparazzi Protection Rule'

Against Overwhelming Opposition, Officials Move to Dismantle Program

If you had any doubts as to whether or not the powers-that-be in Washington had little or no concern for the aviation industry (or much of the private business world, for that matter), here is yet more proof that things have gone seriously wrong in the District Of Colombia. The damage that our lawmakers have done to this industry is ponderous... and the hits just keep on coming...

NBAA has strongly denounced a decision, announced by government officials late Friday afternoon, to push ahead with what has been dubbed a "Paparazzi Protection Rule" - a plan to virtually eliminate a decade-old "do not track" program for the operators of private aircraft.

"We are outraged at the government's move," said NBAA President and CEO Ed Bolen. "As we've said repeatedly, there can be no legitimate reason for a government agency to facilitate the monitoring of wholly private activity by anyone with an internet connection. This incomprehensible policy reversal gives anyone in the world - terrorist, criminal, tabloid stalker, business competitor - the equivalent of an internet homing device to track the movements of citizens and companies in real time."

Bolen went on to reject the claim - made in a May 27 press release revealing the government's plans for dismantling the Block Aircraft Registration Request (BARR) program - that publishing an airplane tail number doesn't reveal the identity of the travelers aboard.

"That argument is pure sophistry," Bolen said. "With an aircraft tail number, anyone with a little initiative can quickly determine the travelers on an aircraft." To illustrate his point, Bolen cited a front-page article, published in The Wall Street Journal on May 21, that describes the flying patterns of numerous citizens and companies based on tail-number information alone.

Bolen noted that Congress enabled the BARR program out of the recognition that getting on an airplane should not be tantamount to forfeiting security or privacy. "That's why the House of Representatives, thousands of individuals and companies and organizations including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers and the Business Roundtable have opposed the government's gratuitous invasion of privacy rights," he said.

Bolen pointed out that the move also puts the government on a slippery slope when it comes to privacy protections. "If this rule passes," he asked, "What's to stop the government from releasing the records on drivers' E-Z pass use on highways, passenger manifests for airline flights, individuals' cell-phone calling traffic, and consumers' credit card use?

"What is most puzzling about this rule is that the Obama administration has pledged to increase privacy protections, not diminish them," Bolen said. "But here, government officials have chosen to sidestep the original intention of the U.S. Congress, the voices of thousands of citizens and companies, and a basic responsibility to safeguard the right to privacy in favor of a rule to invade the privacy and security of passengers in order to cater to tabloid special interests and others with suspect motives. When it comes to privacy rights, this is not the kind of change that the American people want."

FMI: www.nbaa.org/barr

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.14.25: Laser Threat, VeriJet BK, Duffy Threatens Problem Controllers

Also: USAF Pilots, Atlanta Tower Evac, Archer Spotlight Dissipates, Hop-A-Jet Sues A social-media call for people to point lasers at aircraft flying over Portland’s ICE facil>[...]

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.17.25)

"On the way back to the United States from NATO’s Defense Ministers meeting, Secretary of War Hegseth’s plane made an unscheduled landing in the United Kingdom due to a>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-28-180

Pilot Was Transporting His Family Back To Their Home In Boise And He Planned To Fly Back To SHR That Afternoon On September 1, 2025 about 1612 mountain daylight time, a Piper PA-28>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC