AEA Comments On EASA Rulemaking | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Jul 19, 2003

AEA Comments On EASA Rulemaking

On The Record Regarding Part 66 And Part M

The Aircraft Electronics Association (AEA) has sent official comments to the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on Implementing Rules (IRs) for Part 66 and Part M. Previously, AEA sent comments on EASA IR 145. AEA represents nearly 100 European aviation businesses.

Part 66

AEA does not support the proposed expansion of Part 66 to aircraft below 5700 kg.  The proposed licensing does not conform to the progressive career paths of aviation/avionics maintenance technicians, the proposal is cost prohibitive, the current licensing and oversight of technicians of light aircraft does not support an expedited implementation of a transitional regulations.  In addition, this proposal is cost prohibitive to the individual technicians and the small businesses that employ them.

The proposed regulation is also discriminatory in that it favors businesses located in countries that have state funded/state supported technical training schools while placing a significant financial burden on companies located in countries without state funded technical training programs.

Part M

AEA also  does not support the proposed expansion of Part M to aircraft below 5700 kg, saying the requirement to individually approve each and every aircraft's maintenance program is administratively burdensome to individual National Aviation Authorities; extremely costly to individual owners/operators; and will introduce a lack of standardization essential to the improving safety of general aviation maintenance and operations.

Furthermore, the proposed regulation will discourage growth in the ownership of general aviation aircraft.  The proposal will channel limited financial resources away from safety enhancing cockpit technology in order to develop maintenance work cards and maintenance management plans.  The administrative burden imposed by this proposal is not based on quantitative or qualitative analysis of any known problems but rather an arbitrary expansion of JAR-OPS criteria intended for commercial aircraft operations.

FMI: www.aea.net

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC