AEA Comments On EASA Rulemaking | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Jul 19, 2003

AEA Comments On EASA Rulemaking

On The Record Regarding Part 66 And Part M

The Aircraft Electronics Association (AEA) has sent official comments to the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on Implementing Rules (IRs) for Part 66 and Part M. Previously, AEA sent comments on EASA IR 145. AEA represents nearly 100 European aviation businesses.

Part 66

AEA does not support the proposed expansion of Part 66 to aircraft below 5700 kg.  The proposed licensing does not conform to the progressive career paths of aviation/avionics maintenance technicians, the proposal is cost prohibitive, the current licensing and oversight of technicians of light aircraft does not support an expedited implementation of a transitional regulations.  In addition, this proposal is cost prohibitive to the individual technicians and the small businesses that employ them.

The proposed regulation is also discriminatory in that it favors businesses located in countries that have state funded/state supported technical training schools while placing a significant financial burden on companies located in countries without state funded technical training programs.

Part M

AEA also  does not support the proposed expansion of Part M to aircraft below 5700 kg, saying the requirement to individually approve each and every aircraft's maintenance program is administratively burdensome to individual National Aviation Authorities; extremely costly to individual owners/operators; and will introduce a lack of standardization essential to the improving safety of general aviation maintenance and operations.

Furthermore, the proposed regulation will discourage growth in the ownership of general aviation aircraft.  The proposal will channel limited financial resources away from safety enhancing cockpit technology in order to develop maintenance work cards and maintenance management plans.  The administrative burden imposed by this proposal is not based on quantitative or qualitative analysis of any known problems but rather an arbitrary expansion of JAR-OPS criteria intended for commercial aircraft operations.

FMI: www.aea.net

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Funk B85C

According To The Witness, Once The Airplane Landed, It Continued To Roll In A Relatively Straight Line Until It Impacted A Tree In His Front Yard On November 4, 2025, about 12:45 e>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.21.25)

"In the frame-by-frame photos from the surveillance video, the left engine can be seen rotating upward from the wing, and as it detaches from the wing, a fire ignites that engulfs >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.21.25): Radar Required

Radar Required A term displayed on charts and approach plates and included in FDC NOTAMs to alert pilots that segments of either an instrument approach procedure or a route are not>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ScaleBirds Seeks P-36 Replica Beta Builders

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): It’s a Small World After All… Founded in 2011 by pilot, aircraft designer and builder, and U.S. Air Force veteran Sam Watrous, Uncasville,>[...]

Airborne 11.21.25: NTSB on UPS Accident, Shutdown Protections, Enstrom Update

Also: UFC Buys Tecnams, Emirates B777-9 Buy, Allegiant Pickets, F-22 And MQ-20 The NTSB's preliminary report on the UPS Flight 2976 crash has focused on the left engine pylon's sep>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC