Tankers on Sale | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.03.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.05.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Affordable Flying Expo Tickets (Discount Code: AFE2025): CLICK HERE!
LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall, 1800ET, 11.07.25: www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 14, 2003

Tankers on Sale

Boeing Drops Price, Solves 'Combi' Problem

A Reuters story says that, for reasons unknown (unexpected competition from Airbus? unbridled patriotism?), unnamed DoD officials, "said Boeing officials had agreed to trim the price of each 767-200ER aircraft to around $136 million, bringing the overall price of the lease deal down to around $14 billion from $17 billion. The revised deal calls for the Air Force to purchase the tankers at the end of the six-year lease term for an additional $3.5 billion, down from $4 billion in the original deal."

The military, hoping to assuage cashflow problems, has turned to aircraft leasing -- 11 new 767-based tankers will soon join the fleet of 545 (707-based) KC-135s -- as one useful strategy. The effect of long-term debt (on a purchase deal) would be moved to a new line on the balance sheet, and the cash outlay, year-to-year, could also be reduced.

Government deals, immune from IRS prying and interference, can use more-creative ways to save money than private-sector businesses; and their motivations and constraints are also considerably different. A lease, for government, could be the wave of the future.

There's another twist to the newest 767 tanker deal, too: unlike recent iterations, the machines would be configurable to convert from tanker to transport duty and back, rather than the so-called "combi" machines, which would carry some cargo and/or troops, but less fuel. Apparently, someone at DoD figured that the likelihood of a mission that would require troops on an aerial refueling route was small enough that a more-specialized aircraft would answer the need.

FMI: www.dod.gov, www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.06.25)

Aero Linx: The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is a United Nations agency which helps 193 countries to coopera>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Champion 7GC

About 25 Days (9.3 Hours) Before The Accident, The Airframe Was Modified With Different Landing Gear Legs, Wheels, And Brakes Analysis: The pilot reported that during the landing r>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.06.25)

“Over 2025, Vertical has shown that when we set targets, we deliver. Whilst maintaining our industry-leading capital efficiency, we are not only demonstrating all piloted fli>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.06.25)

Aero Linx: Air Medical Physician Association (AMPA) The Air Medical Physician Association (AMPA) is the largest professional organization of physicians dedicated to rotor wing (hel>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC