ACLU Sues Feds Over No-Fly List | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Apr 07, 2004

ACLU Sues Feds Over No-Fly List

Says Innocent Travelers Are Being Harassed

It's no secret that the TSA is keeping a list and checking it twice, hoping to find who's naughty or nice. And as far as the American Civil Liberties Union is concerned, therein lies the rub.

The ACLU Tuesday sued the TSA on behalf of seven airline passengers the civil liberties group says have been wrongly placed on the so-called "do not fly" list.

"Many innocent travelers who pose no safety risk whatsoever are stopped and searched repeatedly," the ACLU said in a statement issued prior to Tuesday's filing.

The TSA actually keeps two lists and, while their existence is no secret, their contents are. One list contains the names of people the TSA says can't fly.

The second list contains the names of "selectees," those who are given that extra special attention during security screening. How does a name get on one of those lists? You generally have to be referred by a law enforcement or intelligence agency.

At this point, no one knows just how to go about getting off such a list. So says David Sobel, general counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "There doesn't seem to be any reliable way to resolve the problem that these people continuously confront."

The TSA admits its name-matching technology isn't perfect. Some people with the same names as those on the lists have run into extra screening and outright flight bans, according to Sobel, even though they themselves have done nothing to warrant the extra special attention.

In such cases, the FBI says you should call law enforcement or the Bureau itself to clear up matters. But some passengers say, even after repeated attempts, they still face the same grueling ordeal at the airport whenever they try to fly.

But the ACLU says, if you think it's bad now, wait until CAPPS II is implemented and the number of names on the lists jumps into the hundreds or thousands.

FMI: www.tsa.gov, www.aclu.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.30.25): Ground Stop (GS)

Ground Stop (GS) The GS is a process that requires aircraft that meet a specific criteria to remain on the ground. The criteria may be airport specific, airspace specific, or equip>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.30.25)

Aero Linx: Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) improves safety and public confidence in aviation, marine and rail transport thro>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.30.25)

“The Palo Alto stopover confirmed—yet again—that flight schools and aero-clubs are no longer just curious about electric training; they are ready to buy. In just >[...]

NTSB Final Report: ICON A5

Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Clearance From The Water While Flying At A Low Altitude Analysis: The flight of two airplanes was in cruise flight on a north heading about 50 ft >[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC