Parsing The New UAV Registration Rule | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Thu, Dec 17, 2015

Parsing The New UAV Registration Rule

Consultant Says Registration Will Not Significantly Enhance Safety

The new UAV registration rule is "more activity than action," according to at least one attorney-turned-consultant who has been through the 211 pages of the rule.

An article posted to the blog JDA Journal by Consultant Sandy Murdock, who lists "Former FAA Chief Counsel and Acting FAA Deputy Administrator" as part of his vitae, asserts that the process of registration will not enhance safety in the national air space.

By now, we're all aware that any UAV that weighs more than 250 grams must be registered with the FAA. According to the blog, the Interim Final Rule (IFR) is 211 pages of single-spaced small text ... and about 180 of those are an introduction and explanation of the rule. Overall, less than 5 percent of the verbiage in the document is the actual rule.

Murdock writes that the federal government has the authority to publish such an "Interim Final Rule" when it determines that there is "good cause" to dispense with the normal notice and comment period because those procedures are "impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest." The "Administrative Procedure Act" says "that an agency, upon finding good cause, may issue a final rule without seeking comment prior to the rulemaking."

Murdock indicates that some 30 pages in the final rule are used to prove that the FAA had "good cause" to proceed with the rule.

The FAA determined that in part, the "growth of UASs, the near miss incidents, the FAA’s generic power to regulate air traffic, the absence of aviation experience with these UAS 'pilots,' even the comparative ease of electronic filing, etc., as grounds for “good cause."

Murdock then goes on to list some of the rule's highlights, and what they mean to the drone operator or owner.

As a side note, the FAA has posted a page that includes examples of the kinds of UAVs that would nor would not require registration under the new rule.

FMI: Full Blog Post

Advertisement

More News

KidVenture Educational Activities Lineup At EAA AirVenture 2025

Youth Explore With Hands-On Builds, RC Airplanes, Flight Sims, Much More KidVenture is located just north of the EAA Aviation Museum, at Pioneer Airport, and has arranged a myriad >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.07.25)

“About nine decades ago, Amelia Earhart was recruited to Purdue, and the university president later worked with her to prepare an aircraft for her historic flight around the >[...]

Airborne 07.07.25: Sully v Bedford, RAF Vandalism, Discovery Moving?

Also: New Amelia Search, B737 Flap Falls Off, SUN ‘n FUN Unveiling, F-16 Record Captain Sully Sullenberger, the pilot who saved 155 people by safely landing an A320 in the Hu>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.08.25)

"It is critically important for North American flight safety that Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) violations are avoided. All pilots must familiarize themselves with updates to >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 07.08.25: Joby in Dubai, Army Electra, Archer iin Abu Dhabi

Also: Hackers v Aviation, Discovery Moving?, Gogo Galileo HDX, EVE to Costa Rica Joby Aviation announced its electric air taxi successfully completed a series of VTOL wingborne tri>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC