FAA Testimony to 911 Commission Under Fire | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.28.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.29.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.30.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Sun, Sep 03, 2006

FAA Testimony to 911 Commission Under Fire

Executives Failed to Correct Errors

An investigation conducted by the Transportation Department's acting Inspector General (IG) found that three FAA executives (one now retired) knew after the fact that testimony presented to the 9/11 Commission in 2003 was, in fact, false, but they made no effort to correct it.

Acting on complaints from the independent 9/11 Commission, acting IG Todd Zinser conducted a two-year investigation, publishing his findings in a report released Friday, 1 Sep 2006. As reported by the New York Times, Zinser noted -- in direct contradiction to 9/11 commission testimony given -- the FAA and the USAF were not in immediate communication after the first of two aircraft struck the World Trade Center. In fact, they weren't in contact for over 50 minutes.

The FAA testimony in question, given before the 9/11 commission in 2003, claimed the FAA had immediately contacted the USAF. In fact, NORAD even went so far as to claim they were in a position to shoot down Flight 93, which crashed in rural PA after passengers took steps to wrest control of the aircraft from the terrorist hijackers.

While the report urges disciplinary action for the two executives still actively serving, no evidence was found to prove any of the executives acted to knowingly mislead the 9/11 Commission. This mirrors a report made last month by the USAF IG claiming similar errors in testimony provided by military officers could be attributed to poor record-keeping.

The FAA has declined to identify the three executives or what, if any, disciplinary action is to be taken.

Commission members expressed concern the investigation had taken so long. Richard Ben Veniste, a commission member, said the IG's investigation had taken “more time than it took the 9/11 commission to complete all of its work." He also questioned the decision to release the report on the Friday before Labor Day.

The 9/11 Commission was highly critical of the government's immediate repsonse to the hijackings finding "widespread confusion" within the FAA and the military.

FMI: www.dot.gov

Advertisement

More News

Lockheed Hands Over Completed Artemis II Spacecraft

NASA Takes in Orion, Begins Launch Processing for a Crewed Mission Aerospace giant Lockheed Martin recently turned in its share of the Artemis II venture, delivering its Orion spac>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Pulsar Super Pulsar

During The Forced Landing, The Airplane Landed Short Of The Runway And Left Of The Runway Centerline Analysis: The pilot reported that, during the initial climb, the engine lost pa>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Van Horn Rotor Blades -- Tail Rotor Replacements For Bell's 206

From 2010 (YouTube Edition): Company Pioneers Alternatives For Bell 206 TR Blades The approved part replacement business can be a tough one... especially when you're competing with>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.25): Obstacle

Obstacle An existing object, object of natural growth, or terrain at a fixed geographical location or which may be expected at a fixed location within a prescribed area with refere>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.25)

“NATA’s 3,700 member companies operate at nearly 4,500 airports in thousands of communities across the nation, providing air transportation services, driving economic g>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC