Anyone Really Surprised At This Point?
To anyone at Boeing who may have snickered when rival Airbus
experienced a number of delays in bringing its high-profile A380
superjumbo to market... one imagines if you didn't believe in karma
then, you do now.
The Wall Street Journal reports the American planemaker is
poised to announce yet another delay to its troubled 787 Dreamliner
program, due to the recent strike by workers represented by the
International Association of Machinists.
Citing unnamed sources, the WSJ says Boeing will announce later
this month first deliveries of the composite-bodied jet will be
pushed to summer of 2010, with the possibility the aircraft's first
flight may not happen until late 2009. "There is no question" the
787 will be delayed further, one source told the WSJ. "The real
issue right now is that Boeing wants to make sure it has a
believable date before going back to the customers with more bad
news."
Boeing's latest official statement about the Dreamliner called
for deliveries to start in the third quarter of 2009. If the latest
report is true -- and there's nothing to suggest it isn't --
the latest delay would mean the first 787 will delivered to launch
customer All Nippon Airlines at least two years later than Boeing
had originally hoped.
Touted by Boeing as a revolutionary, highly-efficient airliner
for a environmentally-conscious world, for the moment the
Dreamliner has instead become the company's largest embarrassment
since the Darleen Druyun fiasco. Boeing announced its first six-month delay to the 787
program in October 2007, citing parts shortages and
issues with integrating systems on the first airliner... which was
revealed to have been little more than a hastily-assembled shell at
a lavish July 8, 2007 rollout event.

Boeing further pushed off its development
schedule in January 2008...
and then again in April. Just as it appeared
Boeing had ironed out its supplier woes and technical issues -- if
only with the first few planes, at least -- the 57-day IAM strike
came along.
The planemaker has since been confounded by yet another
technical problem, as well: improperly installed fasteners
throughout the first 12 planes,
which were later found to be due to confusing installation
specs, written by Boeing's own engineers.
Boeing declined to comment on the Journal's report, with a
spokesman saying only the planemaker is "currently reviewing the
schedule" and would make an announcement shortly.
In the meantime, 787 customers are growing increasingly weary
with the long string of unpleasant surprises coming from
Boeing.
Calling the 787 "the world's rarest airplane," Virgin Atlantic
Airways CEO Steve Ridgeway told the paper "we're pretty fed up"
with the delays. "We've got no clarity from Boeing.... we don't
know how long the delay is now."
Ridgeway also lamented how Boeing's focus to date has been on
getting the first planes delivered, "but nobody's talking about
production run-rates... Just getting the first ones delivered to a
handful of airlines isn't the end of the story," he said.
While there's little doubt about how delays to the 787 have
harmed Boeing in the short-term, it's hard to gauge how Boeing's
ongoing problems with the Dreamliner will ultimately hurt the
planemaker's overall reputation. Prior to the 787, Boeing for the
most part had enjoyed a streak of on-time introductions for its new
airliners, most notably with the June 1995 introduction
of its 777.