American Airlines Incurs $4.1-Million DOT Fine | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.12.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.14.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.15.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.16.25

Fri, Sep 01, 2023

American Airlines Incurs $4.1-Million DOT Fine

Investigators Cite 43 Violations of Tarmac Delay Rule

The U.S. Department of Transportation has levied a record $4.1-million fine against American Airlines (AAL) for unlawfully holding passengers aboard delayed aircraft for excessively long periods of time.

American Airlines was determined to have repeatedly violated the DOT's Tarmac Delay Rule (Second Final Rule on Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections-EAPP #2) which sets forth U.S. air-carriers—barring a limited number of exceptions germane to safety and security—may not hold domestic flights on airport tarmacs for more than three-hours. International flights may be held no longer than four-hours. Moreover, in such instances as delays surpass two-hours, U.S. air-carriers are obligated to provide enplaned passengers water and snacks. Aircraft cabins are required by law to be maintained at comfortable temperatures, and passengers must have access to operable toilets and necessary medical care.  

The fine assessed against American Airlines is the largest civil penalty yet issued for violations of the DOT’s Tarmac Delay Rule. Furthermore, passengers illegally detained aboard AAL flights are collectively owed more than $2.5-billion in delay-related refunds.

The DOT’s Office of Aviation Consumer Protection determined that between 2018 and 2021, 43 domestic American Airlines flights sat on airport tarmacs for periods of time exceeding those codified in the Department’s Tarmac Delay Rule. The airline’s culpability was compounded by its crews’ overwhelming failures to provide passengers food or water—as specified in the rule.

The majority of the delays—which affected some 5,800 AAL passengers—occurred at DFW.

Of the 43 violations identified by DOT investigators, none were found to meet the Tarmac Delay Rule’s exception criteria.

In a statement, controversial U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg remarked: "This is the latest action in our continued drive to enforce the rights of airline passengers. Whether the issue is extreme tarmac delays or problems getting refunds, DOT will continue to protect consumers and hold airlines accountable."

To the subject of the delays and the hefty fine occasioned thereby, American Airlines contended: "While these delays were the result of exceptional weather events, the flights represent a very small number of the 7.7-million flights during this time period. We have since apologized to the impacted customers and regret any inconvenience caused."

Remarkably, the explanation of the Tarmac Delay Rule set forth on the DOT’s website (www.transportation.gov/individuals/aviation-consumer-protection/tarmac-delays) states:

If an airline offers me the opportunity to get off the airplane during a tarmac delay and I choose to get off, is the airline required to let me back on the airplane?

  • No.  Passengers should be aware that if they choose to get off the airplane during a tarmac delay, airlines are not required to let them back on the airplane. The flight may take off without them and passengers may be responsible for finding another flight.
  •  If passengers decide to exit the aircraft during a tarmac delay and the aircraft eventually takes off for its intended destination, the airline may not be required to offload any passenger’s checked bags before the plane takes off. Passengers will need to contact the airline about returning their checked luggage at a later time.
FMI: www.transportation.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Hy-Tek Hurricane HP

About 100 Ft Above Ground Level, The Engine Lost Total Power On April 14, 2025, about 1003 Pacific daylight time, an experimental amateur-built Hy-Tek Hurricane HP, N9088G, was sub>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.14.25): Flight Check

Flight Check A call-sign prefix used by FAA aircraft engaged in flight inspection/certification of navigational aids and flight procedures. The word “recorded” may be a>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.14.25)

“While our traditional mechanical magnetos will be around for a long time, Hartzell Engine Tech acquired E-MAG to expand its PowerUP Ignition System product portfolio into bo>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.15.25): Primary Radar

Primary Radar A radar system in which a minute portion of a radio pulse transmitted from a site is reflected by an object and then received back at that site for processing and dis>[...]

Airborne 05.12.25: $1M Flying Car, Marion Airport Saved, AirVenture Cup

Also: ‘Sonoran Beauty’ Jump-Qualified, IAG Orders, FAA Shuts Down ATC Oversight, EAA Joins Modern Skies Slovakia-based developer Klein Vision recently unveiled the prod>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC