FAA Reopens ADS-B Comment Period | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.28.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.29.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.30.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Thu, Oct 02, 2008

FAA Reopens ADS-B Comment Period

AEA Encourages Public To Weigh In

The FAA has opted to reopen the comment period on a controversial plan to require all aircraft be equipped with so-called "ADS-B Out" equipment by 2020.

On October 5, 2007, the Federal Aviation Administration published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing performance requirements for certain avionics equipment on aircraft operating in specified classes of airspace within the United States National Airspace System.

The FAA chartered the Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) on July 15, 2007, to provide a forum for the US aviation community to discuss and review an NPRM for ADS-B; formulate recommendations on presenting and structuring an ADS-B mandate; and consider additional actions that could be necessary to implement those recommendations.

The comment period closed March 3, 2008... and by an overwhelming majority, pilots and operators said the potential benefits of requiring ADS-B equipment on all aircraft operating in the National Airspace System were not worth the substantial costs to equip all those planes.

The ARC reviewed 1,423 comments submitted to the docket by 165 entities, categorized the comments for further analysis, and studied the issues underlying 1,101 of the 1,423 comments on the docket. The agency recorded just over 101 positive comments; the rest of the comments noted faults with at least part of the FAA's plan.

The ARC has since made 36 summary recommendations regarding the ADS-B link strategy, program, business case, required equipment, security and privacy. The ARC divided the recommendations into two broad categories: recommendations to be resolved before any rule is adopted, and recommendations for future action.

The FAA recently opted to reopen the comment period for an additional 30 days, to give the public an opportunity to comment on recommendations received from the ARC. Comments must be received before November 3, 2008.

The Aircraft Electronics Association says it is reviewing the ARC report, and will submit comments to the FAA. The AEA encourages its membership to review the ADS-B report and submit comments to the FAA as well.

FMI: www.aea.net, Read The ARC Notice (.pdf)

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Cozy Cub

Witness Reported The Airplane Was Flying Low And Was In A Left Bank When It Struck The Power Line Analysis: The pilot was on final approach to land when the airplane collided with >[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Seated On The Edge Of Forever -- A PPC's Bird's Eye View

From 2012 (YouTube Edition): A Segment Of The Sport Aviation World That Truly Lives "Low And Slow" Pity the life of ANN's Chief videographer, Nathan Cremisino... shoot the most exc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.29.25)

Aero Linx: International Business Aviation Council (IBAC) IBAC promotes the growth of business aviation, benefiting all sectors of its industry and in all regions of the world. As >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.29.25): Execute Missed Approach

Execute Missed Approach Instructions issued to a pilot making an instrument approach which means continue inbound to the missed approach point and execute the missed approach proce>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC