...And Here, Darn it, Are The Heartbreakers
It is both the most "fun," and most difficult task, facing the
ANN staff at the end of every year -- determining who, or what, did
the most to promote the cause of aviation in the past 365 days...
while also chastising those people or entities that did all they
could to undermine the many successes the aerospace community has
managed to accomplish.
Alas, 2007 saw more than its fair share of downers,
aviation-wise. Sure, "stuff" happens... but a few folks, issues, or
entities seemed to go out of their way to create problems for the
world of aviation.
So... it is ANN's annual obligation to recognize a solid dozen
of our Aero-Heartbreakers for 2007... in something of an informal
order, starting from 12th to the 1st. Let us know what you think of
our selections... whom YOU would have liked be included, or
omitted, from such a list. In the meantime, we hope those who had
something to do with this year's selections think a little more
positively about the welfare of this industry, so that future
lists become harder and harder to catalog. Be it ignorance,
arrogance or just plain incompetence, these were the folks or
topics that made our lot a whole lot more difficult and
immeasurably injured the aviation world in the past year.
Shame on those issues, folks or topics that made our lot so much
tougher in 2007...
From the Heartbreaker's List #12: Sky-High LSA Costs
Much has been written about the need to bring "new blood" into
the aviation business... how we need (desperately) new pilots and a
way to provide ready access to the freedom of the skies for all
those who have dreamed of playing among the clouds. We
truly need a cost-effective path for people to follow, in
order to stretch their wings... but to be honest, we're not
sure that $100-130K LSAs are the ticket we've been looking for.
LSAs, simply put, cost too much. An LSA, according to many,
should cost as much as a decent new automobile... but not as much
as an entry-level home or condo. Mind you, there are a number of
"popular" LSA-type birds out there that don't cost as much as a
house... but most of them are not conventional planforms or are
somewhat less well-equipped than the more costly offerings. So...
is there a middle ground?
Hard to say... because the major problem inherent in making
airplanes cost effective to build and buy relies on the issue of
being able to sell sufficient numbers to make it more
cost-effective to build less-expensive airplanes... in other words,
a cart and horse argument.
Until someone comes up with a more efficient manufacturing
process or a design that lends itself to same, we may be stuck with
more expensive LSAs (and a limited market)... at least until enough
of them get build for there to be a healthy secondary market for
used LSAs. In the meantime, we watch the struggling market with
great anticipation to see if one or more designs can either find a
way to present a more uniquely appealing value proposition (in
other words something that makes people "GOTTA HAVE IT") or a means
by which their aircraft can be brought to market at lower prices.
So far... it hasn't arrived, though a number of industry watchers
look forward, with great anticipation, to see what Cessna and
Cirrus Design's efforts will bring in the coming years.
NTSB Final Report: Cozy Cub
See All