DOT Investigates Unrealistic Airline Schedules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Apr 24, 2007

DOT Investigates Unrealistic Airline Schedules

Actual Arrival Times May Vary... A Lot

It may be hard to believe... but several domestic airlines are publishing flight schedules the carriers know to be, at best, dazzlingly optimistic... and at worst, horribly inaccurate.

That's the word from the Department of Transportation, anyway, which last week said it has launched an investigation into the alleged inaccurate scheduling. The New York Times states as many as eight airlines face potential fines for failing to tell the truth in their flight schedules.

An unnamed DOT spokesman told the paper the agency has contacted airlines 160 times for information about delays on specific flights... requests the carriers failed to heed 41 percent of the time.

Information the DOT was able to collect shows 143 flights in February that were late 15 minutes or more, at least 80 percent of the time.

The agency also found one US Airways flight that, literally, is NEVER on time. On average, Flight 154 from Philadelphia to San Francisco arrives 61 minutes behind its published arrival time.

News like that does not sit well with lawmakers, meeting to determine whether federal action is necessary to insure the rights of passengers on airline flights, as the summer travel -- and storm -- season looms.

“I was pretty exasperated,” said House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman James L. Oberstar (D-MN). “They don’t learn from each other,” he added, in reference to carriers failing to learn from the mistakes of their competitors.

The airlines state federal interaction is unnecessary, and the problems would best be left to the individual carriers to solve.

Airlines want to be left alone to deal with the problems, and the Transportation Department has thus far mostly agreed with that approach. But some in Congress feel otherwise.

FMI: www.dot.gov, www.airlines.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC