Inadequate Planning Blamed In Wings Over Dallas Mid-Air Collision | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Dec 13, 2024

Inadequate Planning Blamed In Wings Over Dallas Mid-Air Collision

NTSB Cites Shortcomings In Prebriefing, Oversight, And Risk Control

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), in a media release on December 9, points to inadequate planning as the primary factor leading to the fatal mid-air collision of a Boeing B-17G bomber and a Bell P-63F fighter during the Wings Over Dallas air show in November 2022 at Dallas Executive Airport in Texas.

The pilot, copilot, flight engineer, and two scanners in the B-17G and the pilot of the P-63F were fatally injured and both airplanes were destroyed. Both aircraft were operated by the Commemorative Air Force (CAF).

The accident occurred as the eight airplanes in the performance were completing a repositioning turn that involved a 90-degree right turn followed by a 270-degree left turn. The P-63F was in a descending left turn when it struck the left wing of the B-17G from behind.

Using data analysis from a visibility simulation that modeled the aircraft flight paths, altitudes, and roll angles of the airplanes, NTSB investigators determined that the pilots had limited ability to see and avoid each other’s aircraft. This was attributed to the geometry of the flight paths, and obscuration of the pilots’ out-the-window views by aircraft structures.

The NTSB concluded that there was a lack of a prebriefed aircraft separation plan as well as administrative actions to address the predictable risks associated with the series of maneuvers planned for the performance.

Investigators turned up additional safety issues including the lack of a risk assessment plan, unclear communication orders, a lack of requirements for recurrent evaluation of air bosses, inadequate air show safety assessment and reporting issues within the CAF, and insufficient regulatory oversight.

The NTSB also concluded that the circumstances of the accident accentuate the inherent limitations of the see-and-avoid concept for collision avoidance, particularly in the rapidly-moving environment of an air show performance involving multiple dissimilar aircraft.

FMI:  https://www.ntsb.gov/

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra Aircraft Announces the Extra 330SX

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): An Even Faster Rolling Extra! Jim Campbell joined General Manager of Extra Aircraft Duncan Koerbel at AirVenture 2023 to talk about what’s up and>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.15.25)

“Receiving our Permit to Fly and starting Phase 4 marks a defining moment for Vertical Aerospace. Our team has spent months verifying every core system under close regulatory>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.15.25): Middle Marker

Middle Marker A marker beacon that defines a point along the glideslope of an ILS normally located at or near the point of decision height (ILS Category I). It is keyed to transmit>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Lancair 320

The Experienced Pilot Chose To Operate In Instrument Meteorological Conditions Without An Instrument Flight Rules Clearance Analysis: The airplane was operated on a personal cross->[...]

Airborne 11.14.25: Last DC-8 Retires, Boeing Recovery, Teeny Trig TXP

Also: ATI Strike Prep, Spirit Still Troubled, New CubCrafters Dealership, A-29 Super Tucano Samaritan’s Purse is officially moving its historic Douglas DC-8 cargo jet into re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC