DJI Takes On 'Countering CCP Drones Act' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.21.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.22.25

Airborne-FltTraining-10.23.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Tue, Mar 12, 2024

DJI Takes On 'Countering CCP Drones Act'

"If this Passes, US Operators Would No Longer Be Able to Access New DJI Drones"

Chinese drone manufacturer DJI took issue with a recent move in Congress, the "Countering CCP Drones Act", introduced by Elise Stefanik.

The legislation would add DJI's parent company, Shenzhen Da-Jiang Innovations Sciences and Technologies, as well as any subsidiary or affiliate to the list of banned brands of communications equipment under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019. That would absolutely kneecap DJI's presence in the US market, requiring considerable workarounds to even consider sticking around in the market with DJI-manufactured equipment. Stefanik said that there's a profound national security risk in allowing foreign data collecting systems to operate freely in US comms infrastructure.

Understandably, DJI took serious issue with the prospect of being banned from the market entirely. They said that Stefanik & co. "continue to reference inaccurate and unsubstantiated allegations regarding DJI’s operations, and have amplified xenophobic narratives in a quest to support local drone manufacturers and eliminate market competition."

The firm points out the damage that could be caused by the loss of DJI products from the "broad ecosystem of operators, businesses and public safety agencies that rely on their technologies to conduct safe and efficient operations."

DJI assumes that at the very least their products would be barred from importation going forward, with a possibility that extant DJI equipment already in domestic service would be grounded. They include a few Q&A sections in their response, reiterating their stance that the company is not beholden to any extralegal procedures or governmental demands, that it's not a military company, and that their equipment operates as a vast intelligence collection system unbeknownst to consumers.

FMI: www.viewpoints.dji.com

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.20.25: FAA Eases On Boeing, Flexjet Lawsuit, Textron Chops eAviation

Also: Global 8000 Records, Cockpit Window Crack Mystery, Daher Brazilian Ops, Senators Push ADS-B/Safety Reviews Boeing has been approved to churn out up to 42 MAX jets per month, >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 10.16.25: Cops Shooting Drones?, Lilium Patents, Trains v UAVs

Also: Sikorsky Intro's U-Hawk, EAA On UAS-BVLOS, Joby Airshow Demo, Hospital Vertiport German regulators are pushing forward a law that would allow police officers to shoot drones >[...]

Airborne 10.17.25: Gryder Airport/Gun Arrest, Hegseth C32 Probs, Hartzell Update

Also: Helicopter Dog Rescue, USDOT Spared In Layoffs, Guardian Avionics, Isaacman Back In Running? The name ’Dan Gryder’ is fairly well known to many in aviation.... Wh>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ICAS Perspectives - Advice for New Air Show Performers

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Leading Air Show Performers Give Their Best Advice for Newcomers On December 6th through December 9th, the Paris Las Vegas Hotel hosted over 1,500 air >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 10.21.25: NZ Goes Electric, World Cup UAVs, eAviation Shuttered

Also: SkyFly’s Axe Prototype, USAF CCA, AV Expands Switchblade, DropShip Cargo Drone Air New Zealand has taken its first big step toward electric aviation, flying the US-buil>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC