Shuttle Foam Problems Increased With Switch To Environmentally Friendly Foam | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.28.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.29.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.30.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Tue, Aug 02, 2005

Shuttle Foam Problems Increased With Switch To Environmentally Friendly Foam

Discovery Thermal Protection System Damage Appears Minimal

NASA switched to a Freon-free insulating foam for the external fuel tanks starting with the STS-87 flight of the Shuttle Columbia in 1997. This flight received dramatically more damage then previous flights. Subsequent shuttle flights using the new foam continued to result in up to 11 times more damage then previous flights with the original foam.

The switch to the environmentally friendly foam was made as part of a NASA effort to reduce the environmental impact of space flights. EPA regulations banning CFC's including Freon were put in place due to a suspected link to high altitude Ozone layer depletion.

Examination of the extensive inspection photographs of Discovery has found only small damage to the thermal protection system. NASA has admitted that it was simply luck that one piece of foam almost as large as the one blamed for the destruction of Columbia missed the leading edge of Discoveries wing, and has grounded the remainder of the shuttle fleet until a solution is found. If that piece of foam would have fallen off just 30 seconds sooner in the flight it may have hit the shuttle with similar force as the one that doomed Columbia.

A detailed search through the pictures and video taken during Discovery's launch has found a much smaller piece of foam that apparently deflecting off the wing. Other items found during the inspection include a piece of damaged tile on the critical nose wheel door and a piece of gap filler, which insulates between the tiles, which is protruding located slightly farther back on the belly of the shuttle. These areas are being examined in great detail.

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Cozy Cub

Witness Reported The Airplane Was Flying Low And Was In A Left Bank When It Struck The Power Line Analysis: The pilot was on final approach to land when the airplane collided with >[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Seated On The Edge Of Forever -- A PPC's Bird's Eye View

From 2012 (YouTube Edition): A Segment Of The Sport Aviation World That Truly Lives "Low And Slow" Pity the life of ANN's Chief videographer, Nathan Cremisino... shoot the most exc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.29.25)

Aero Linx: International Business Aviation Council (IBAC) IBAC promotes the growth of business aviation, benefiting all sectors of its industry and in all regions of the world. As >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.29.25): Execute Missed Approach

Execute Missed Approach Instructions issued to a pilot making an instrument approach which means continue inbound to the missed approach point and execute the missed approach proce>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC