Vote On Appropriations Bill, With Or Without VH-71, Likely To Be Delayed | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Nov 13, 2009

Vote On Appropriations Bill, With Or Without VH-71, Likely To Be Delayed

One Congressman Says Vote May Not Come Until December

A New York Congressman says the vote on the Appropriations Conference Bill could be delayed into December, in part over funding for the VH-71 Presidential Helicopter.

Rep. Maurice Hinchey

Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) says the House version of the Defense Appropriations Bill contains $485.2 million to make the first five VH-71's operational, but the Senate version does not. Congressman John Murtha (D-PA) said earlier this month that he would not push for inclusion of the funds in the conference report in a effort to not "embarrass the President" who is opposed to the funding. Murtha chairs the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee.

Hinchey, who represents the district that is home to the Lockheed Martin facility in Owego, where the VH-71 would be assembled, said Murtha may have been misquoted in the Capital newspaper "The Hill."  He told the Binghamton Press Connects that Murtha is "under pressure from a variety of places that are opposed to continuing the VH-71."

Rep. John Murtha

Hinchey believes that if the program was funded, it could mean 600 jobs would return to Owego which were cut when it looked like the VH-71 was dead. Murtha spokesman Matthew Mazonkey did not comment on the article in "The Hill," saying "The House position on the presidential helicopter program is clear. We believe that it is in the best interest of taxpayers to make operational the five aircraft that have already been built."

FMI: http://appropriations.house.gov/Subcommittees/sub_def.shtml

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC