FAA Defuses 'Tower Safety' Rhetoric | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Sep 05, 2003

FAA Defuses 'Tower Safety' Rhetoric

FAA Statement (Attributable to Administrator Marion C. Blakey) Regarding DOT Inspector General's Report on Contract Tower Safety and Operational Costs:

The Inspector General’s recent report confirms the contract tower program continues to serve the flying public safely and efficiently as it has for more than two decades. 

The report’s findings make it clear that safety is not an issue. In fact, contract towers have a significantly better safety record than comparable FAA towers. Contract towers also cost significantly less than federally-staffed ones and provide substantial savings to taxpayers -— $173 million to be exact, according to the IG’s report. 

The report refutes most of the rhetoric and reveals recent charges regarding the contract tower program to be wholly without merit. The FAA believes it is highly irresponsible to jeopardize legislation that provides critical funding for our entire aviation system, in an attempt to add thousands of new employees to the federal payroll.

Note: The next day [Friday], that statement was corrected to read:

The Inspector General’s new report, requested by the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, confirms the contract tower program continues to serve the flying public safely and efficiently as it has for more than two decades. 

The report’s findings make it clear that contract towers have a very strong safety record. At the same time, they also cost significantly less than federally staffed towers and provide substantial savings to taxpayers—$173 million to be exact, according to the IG’s report. 

The report proves that recent charges regarding the contract tower program are wholly without merit. The FAA believes it is highly irresponsible to jeopardize legislation that provides critical funding for our entire aviation system in an attempt to add thousands of new employees to the federal payroll.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC