War Of Words Escalates Over KC-X Tanker Program | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Fri, Oct 30, 2009

War Of Words Escalates Over KC-X Tanker Program

International Association Of Machinists Blasts Northrup/EADS Bid

While the Air Force continues to wrestle with replacing it's aging fleet of KC-135 tankers, a war of words continues to get louder, with various factions hoping to slice off a piece of the multi-billion dollar program. Earlier in the week, lawmakers from four southern states announced an alliance who's stated initial purpose is to promote the Northrop Grumman/EADS tanker, which they say would be built largely on the U.S. Gulf Coast. Wednesday, General Vice President Richard Michalski of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers issued the following statement, which he said responds to recent statements by Northrop Grumman about its bid to win the Air Force's $35 billion tanker contract:

"EADS/Airbus is currently promoting its phantom tanker program around the world without Northrop Grumman. So here's the 'big why:' if Northrop Grumman is a full partner with EADS/Airbus on the tanker program, why aren't they being marketed around the world alongside the French company?

It turns out that the 'big why' is a big lie. EADS/Airbus is using Northrop Grumman as mere window dressing on its latest ploy to steal American jobs.

The Air Force has requested a tanker aircraft based on an existing commercial aircraft. Northrop has never built a single commercial aircraft, nor does it have the assembly lines or engineers needed to build one. Instead, EADS intends to propose its A330, which is made and maintained in Europe and is the product of what has been determined by the World Trade Organization to be an illegal subsidy campaign intended to steal U.S. jobs.

The so-called Northrop/EADS partnership on the tankers is little more than a press release. We need a fully transparent procurement process for the tanker replacement.

The first step would be to acknowledge that the A330 is an EADS/Airbus bid that is financed with European subsidies that the World Trade Organization has declared illegal."

FMI: www.goiam.org

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Rutan Long-EZ

He Attempted To Restart The Engine Three Times. On The Third Restart Attempt, He Noticed That Flames Were Coming Out From The Right Wing Near The Fuel Cap Analysis: The pilot repor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ICAS Perspectives - Advice for New Air Show Performers

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Leading Air Show Performers Give Their Best Advice for Newcomers On December 6th through December 9th, the Paris Las Vegas Hotel hosted over 1,500 air >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.28.25)

Aero Linx: NASA ASRS ASRS captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community. The ASRS is an i>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.28.25)

“For our inaugural Pylon Racing Seminar in Roswell, we were thrilled to certify 60 pilots across our six closed-course pylon race classes. Not only did this year’s PRS >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC