NTSB Report on Alaska Flight 261 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Tue, Dec 10, 2002

NTSB Report on Alaska Flight 261

Not Enough Grease on Jackscrew

Putting to rest voluminous outside speculation about the cause of the crash of Alaska Airlines Flight 261, the NTSB is expected today to say what's been the popular explanation for nearly three years: not enough grease on the jackscrew caused the failure, which caused loss of control of the aircraft, and the deaths of all 88 aboard.

The flight, from Puerta Vallarta to San Francisco, went down January 30, 2000, off Point Mugu (CA).

Nearly immediately, as the wreckage was recovered (bottom photo), investigators turned to the horizontal stabilizer's jackscrew (right). When it was recovered along with its mating gymbal nut, it showed high friction and stripping, indicative of binding, which is indicative of insufficient lubrication.

Later, the issue of inspection came up, and many heads were put on the block. An inspection of the jackscrew called for replacement of the expensive assembly; four subsequent inspections showed the screw assembly to be in-tolerance, though just barely.

Further sleuthing revealed there had been two types of grease applied, at different times, to that jackscrew.

Both were approved greases; but there was a question of the compatibility of the greases -- could they work with each other, if mixed -- and the verdict was that they could not. Was the removal of the old grease thorough enough, to preclude any incompatibility? Would such incompatibility be sufficient to cause the wear and binding that brought the airliner down?

The NTSB's final report should put ANN's "Story of the Year 2000" to bed, and hopefully, to rest. From here, it's up to the lawyers to keep things so 'profitably' stirred up...

FMI: www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20001212X20339&key=1

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.03.24)

"We are reaching out to you today on behalf of the Popular Rotorcraft Association because we need your help. We are dangerously close to losing a critical resource that if lost, wi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.03.24): UAS Traffic Management (UTM)

UAS Traffic Management (UTM) The unmanned aircraft traffic management ecosystem that will allow multiple low altitude BVLOS operations and which is separate from, but complementary>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.03.24)

Aero Linx: Society of Aviation and Flight Educators (SAFE) SAFE is a member-oriented organization of aviation educators fostering professionalism and excellence in aviation through>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC