Tue, Jan 20, 2004
The CBS reporter who
worked last week's Anti-GA story on small airport security has
responded to an e-mail sent him by ANN's Editor-In-Chief. His
response is included below for everyone's consideration. CBS' Bob
Orr gave ANN his phone number and we are pursuing the possibility
of an interview in order to get more insight into how last week's
story came together as well as the dialogue he advocates. We'll
keep you apprised.
Orr's E-Mail
...I'm sure you're aware that I have been thoroughly castigated
by AOPA members for a story that was completely about the
GOVERNMENT'S responsibilities in protecting our national air space
and security.
We're confident the story was factual, fair, and in context
(when you consider we've done scores of reports since 9/11 about
commercial aviation vulnerabilities and this ONE regarding general
aviation). There's little doubt commercial jetliners and large
metro airports are more likely to be targeted by terrorists than a
Cessna sitting on an FBO tarmac in Iowa. But, since the mid 1990's
terrorists have shown a continuing interest in using small planes
to deliver explosives and/or chem-bio weapons. After 9/11 we cannot
afford to assume that anything is safe.
The bottom line is the
government has STUDIED the challenge of securing some 19-thousand
diverse airfields, but to this point has relied on VOLUNTARY
measures such as "Airport Watch" to provide the security. Now, I
realize a number of aircraft owners and operatives don't want any
more government regulations to go along with all of those
bothersome flight restrictions.
But, I would maintain, now is the time to have an honest
discussion about reasonable steps to make GA uniformly safer and
more secure. I don't think any of us want to wait until after
something happens. I'm not predicting an attack involving GA
aircraft, and in fact, I pray that never occurs. But, that doesn't
mean we should completely disregard any terror possibility no
matter how small it might be or how irritating the report is to any
particular sector, group, or association.
I'm sorry this story has stirred up so many hard feelings. That
was never the intention. At the same time, I think the uproar is a
bit overdone.
It's my hope now that some of the energies being spent in this
debate over journalism might be applied to finding workable,
affordable security solutions we can all live with.
Sincerely, Bob Orr
More News
Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]
Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]
Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]
From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]
Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]